2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The subsystem mechanism of default mode network underlying rumination: A reproducible neuroimaging study

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
44
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
5
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The individual's tendency to daydream is positively associated with dynamic functional connectivity between PCC and the MTL subsystem (Kucyi & Davis, 2014). A study on rumination (Chen et al, 2020) also found an increased connectivity between Core and MTL and a decreased coupling between Core and dMPFC when subjects were in a state of rumination, compared to that in a distraction state. Based on these studies, it is reasonable to conjecture that such a decreased coupling between Core and MTL during short video viewing is related to less occurrence of spontaneous thoughts due to enhanced engagement in processing external video stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The individual's tendency to daydream is positively associated with dynamic functional connectivity between PCC and the MTL subsystem (Kucyi & Davis, 2014). A study on rumination (Chen et al, 2020) also found an increased connectivity between Core and MTL and a decreased coupling between Core and dMPFC when subjects were in a state of rumination, compared to that in a distraction state. Based on these studies, it is reasonable to conjecture that such a decreased coupling between Core and MTL during short video viewing is related to less occurrence of spontaneous thoughts due to enhanced engagement in processing external video stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Scientific understanding of the default network has evolved considerably in the last two decades. It is no longer thought of as a "task-negative network", but is instead understood to support a variety of internal mental processes [5,20], including mindwandering [14], autobiographical planning [11,113], creative thinking [16,18,[183][184][185], dreaming [186], and rumination [187][188][189], as well as aspects of self-experience [23,24]. Indeed, default network activation is task-positive when the experimental task requires internal-oriented mental processes, including when these processes are goal-directed [11].…”
Section: Automatic Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the brain was confronted with different cognitive demands, the FPN can preferentially couple with DMN, as well as the FPN and DMN coordinate the reconstruction of the entire network recon gurations by played different roles [15,34]. In this study, we used the participation coe cient based on the sub-networks partition of Yan et al [9]. As the hub of DMN, core subsystem regulates high-order cognitive function depending on top-down [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MTL subsystem includes the ventral medial prefrontal cortex (vMPFC), posterior inferior parietal lobule, retrosplenial cortex, parahippocampal cortex and hippocampal formation, which is associated with memory processes, such as episodic memory retrieval [7]. Importantly, converging evidences have revealed that the core subsystem is proposed to be the hub linking the other two subsystems together, as well as the functional connectivity of the core subsystem is dependent of the disease which including the anterior medial prefrontal cortex (amPFC) and the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) [6,[8][9][10]. Furthermore, our previous study has demonstrated that the core subsystem-centered connection abnormalities were associated with the progress of cognitive impairments in AD-spectrum patients [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%