1986
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4115(08)62406-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Subliminal Psychodynamic Activation Method: Comprehensive Listing Update, Individual Differences, and Other Considerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ln the context of a question concerning information processing, Silverman stated "It is reasonable to assume that all the information, both verbal and pictorial, gets into the fovea" (Adams, 1982, p. 36). Silverman and Geisler (1986) indcated that Winnett and van Santen (personal communication to L. H. Silverman, March, 1981) observed that Silverman, Ross, et al (1978) and Heilbrun (1980) presented the same stimul~ but Heilbrun's were viewed from a closer distance. Winnett and van Santen calculated that Heilbrun's BEATING stimul~ had larger visual angles than those of Silverman, Ross, et al, a circumstance that changed the meaning of his messages because one or two extrafoveal letters did not register (Silverman & Geisler, 1986).…”
Section: Question Of Position Of Subliminal P~ychodynamic Activation Stimuli I N the Visual Fieldmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ln the context of a question concerning information processing, Silverman stated "It is reasonable to assume that all the information, both verbal and pictorial, gets into the fovea" (Adams, 1982, p. 36). Silverman and Geisler (1986) indcated that Winnett and van Santen (personal communication to L. H. Silverman, March, 1981) observed that Silverman, Ross, et al (1978) and Heilbrun (1980) presented the same stimul~ but Heilbrun's were viewed from a closer distance. Winnett and van Santen calculated that Heilbrun's BEATING stimul~ had larger visual angles than those of Silverman, Ross, et al, a circumstance that changed the meaning of his messages because one or two extrafoveal letters did not register (Silverman & Geisler, 1986).…”
Section: Question Of Position Of Subliminal P~ychodynamic Activation Stimuli I N the Visual Fieldmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Finally, none of his experiments contain evidence that all s t i m h were presented completely within the fovea. That condtion is needed to effect registration of the contents of a stimulus (Silverman & Geisler, 1986), a critical process required to effect positive outcomes (Silverman, 1967).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identification Test (Aggression test). The basic assumption underlying the test design is that, on a picture depicting an 'aggressor' and his 'victim' face to face, subliminal projection of the word 'I' (Swedish YAG') might affect a subject's impression of or empathy with the contrasting roles they represent (Silverman & Geisler, 1986) at .Ol sec. and are prolonged step by step with a quotient of the square root of 2 (as described above).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En gnutta kunskap om det arbete sam utfbrts pa manga laboratorier runtom i varlden skulle kunna forma dessa kritiker att uttrycka sig nagot mera hovsamt (set ex Hentschel et al, 2003). Silverman och hans grupp (Silverman & Geisler, 1986) hart ex lagt ner ett gigantiskt arbete pa att belysa psykodynamiken bakom subliminal paverkan. Vid Lunds och Umea universitet pagar sedan lange studier for att fblja hur olika typer att fbrsvarsmekanismer paverkar individens upplevande och handlande.…”
Section: Psykoanalysunclassified