2013
DOI: 10.1177/0004867413506753
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The subcortical connectome: Hubs, spokes and the space between – a vision for further research in neurodegenerative disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Through the Australian hub, we are connecting with and through to our US and Swedish collaborators. Much of our work has focused upon mapping a subcortical connectome 14 with the key subcortical brain structures as potential biomarkers for neurodegenerative disease. This network has resulted in approximately 20 publications in the last 5 years, largely through the goodwill of the clinical and neuroscience researchers involved.…”
Section: Table 1 Establishing a New Collaborative Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through the Australian hub, we are connecting with and through to our US and Swedish collaborators. Much of our work has focused upon mapping a subcortical connectome 14 with the key subcortical brain structures as potential biomarkers for neurodegenerative disease. This network has resulted in approximately 20 publications in the last 5 years, largely through the goodwill of the clinical and neuroscience researchers involved.…”
Section: Table 1 Establishing a New Collaborative Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigating neuronal elements can be done by quantifying disease-related effects on the morphology of 'hubs' (Looi et al, 2014) while interconnections can be investigated via resting-state functional connectivity (FC) analyses (Damoiseaux et al, 2006). Due to the importance of the caudate nucleus, putamen and the thalamus to the abnormal neural activity associated with PD, coupled with the fact that these structures are considered important hubs in brain networks (Hwang et al, 2017, Looi andWalterfang, 2013), an analysis of the morphology and FC of these structures may yield neuroimaging biomarkers of brain network abnormalities in PD that relate to cognitive dysfunction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand the functioning of brain networks it is necessary to study both the constituent neuronal elements of networks, as well as their interconnections (Sporns et al, 2005). Investigating neuronal elements can be done by quantifying disease-related effects on the morphology of ‘hubs’ (Looi et al, 2014) while interconnections can be investigated via resting-state functional connectivity (FC) analyses (Damoiseaux et al, 2006). Due to the importance of the caudate nucleus, putamen and the thalamus to the abnormal neural activity associated with PD, coupled with the fact that these structures are considered important hubs in brain networks (Hwang et al, 2017, Looi and Walterfang, 2013), an analysis of the morphology and FC of these structures may yield neuroimaging biomarkers of brain network abnormalities in PD that relate to cognitive dysfunction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%