2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2018.12.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The subcellular dynamics of GPCR signaling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, several evidence have emerged supporting other activation models than the classical one, including observations that (1) GPCRs can form either hetero- or homodimers and create functional pre-coupled complexes with heterotrimeric G proteins in the rest state (Han et al, 2009; Parker et al, 2011; Ferre et al, 2014; Nishimura et al, 2017; Prieto, 2017; Durdagi et al, 2018; Navarro et al, 2018; Tóth et al, 2018; Calebiro and Koszegi, 2019); (2) the G proteins can exist in a pre-coupled complex with the GPCR and an effector protein, as AC; further, binding of agonists to GPCR might result in the activation of the G protein without its dissociation from the complex (Ferré, 2015; Navarro et al, 2018); (3) some G α subunits can interact and modulate downstream signaling even when bound to GDP (Kamakura et al, 2013; Lin et al, 2014); (4) newly identified modulators of G protein activity, called GEMs (guanine exchange modulators), can activate and inhibit different G α subunits through the same motif (Gupta et al, 2016; Ghosh et al, 2017).…”
Section: Heterotrimeric G Proteins Of the Gi/o Subfamilymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, several evidence have emerged supporting other activation models than the classical one, including observations that (1) GPCRs can form either hetero- or homodimers and create functional pre-coupled complexes with heterotrimeric G proteins in the rest state (Han et al, 2009; Parker et al, 2011; Ferre et al, 2014; Nishimura et al, 2017; Prieto, 2017; Durdagi et al, 2018; Navarro et al, 2018; Tóth et al, 2018; Calebiro and Koszegi, 2019); (2) the G proteins can exist in a pre-coupled complex with the GPCR and an effector protein, as AC; further, binding of agonists to GPCR might result in the activation of the G protein without its dissociation from the complex (Ferré, 2015; Navarro et al, 2018); (3) some G α subunits can interact and modulate downstream signaling even when bound to GDP (Kamakura et al, 2013; Lin et al, 2014); (4) newly identified modulators of G protein activity, called GEMs (guanine exchange modulators), can activate and inhibit different G α subunits through the same motif (Gupta et al, 2016; Ghosh et al, 2017).…”
Section: Heterotrimeric G Proteins Of the Gi/o Subfamilymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new knowledge on GPCR dynamics is thus a driving force in the research and development of new therapeutic drugs for age-associated diseases, from neurodegenerative to cardiovascular diseases, osteoporosis, type 2 diabetes mellitus, etc. (Guerram et al, 2016; Huang et al, 2017; Lütjens and Rocher, 2017; Tóth et al, 2018; van Gastel et al, 2018; Calebiro and Koszegi, 2019; Maroteaux et al, 2019). To achieve this goal it is necessary to understand how aging and age-associated disease impact other receptorsome components such as the downstream heterotrimeric G proteins.…”
Section: Age-induced Alterations In Brain-enriched Gi/o- Coupled Gpcrsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) constitute one of the largest groups of receptors responsible for signal transmission [36,37,38]. GPCRs are composed of an N-terminal extracellular domain, seven transmembrane helices, and a C-terminal region directed to the cytosol.…”
Section: Cross-talk Between Fgfrs and G-protein-coupled Receptors mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The temporal patterns of TAAR1 activation revealed sustained Gs signaling. This long-lasting action, common among GPCRs, may derive either from persistent signaling (Calebiro and Koszegi, 2019), activation of the downstream cascades after agonist binding, or from persistent agonist-independent activation of the receptor itself (Thomsen et al, 2016). Persistent activation may lead to prolonged influences on cell—particularly neuron—activity and synapse efficacy (Panaccione et al, 2013; Young et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%