2014
DOI: 10.1142/s0219749915600102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The su(1,1)-like intensity-dependent Rabi model: A perturbative analysis of weak and strong-coupling regimes

Abstract: We present a perturbative analysis of a Rabi model where the coupling between the quantized single-mode electromagnetic¯eld and the two-level atom depends on the¯eld intensity. Upon modeling the matter-radiation coupling through the Holstein-Primako® realization of algebra suð1; 1Þ, we evaluate¯rst-and second-order eigenenergies and eigenstates both in the weakcoupling regime (atom transition frequency smaller than the coupling strength) and in the strong-coupling regime. In the¯rst case, among various e®ects,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hamiltonian (A.1) (emerging from the Bogoliubov approach and leading to the diagonal form (10)) thus predicts a spectral collapse of the energy levels for W 2 → U a U b . This mechanism is discussed in detail in [30] and [31]. The resulting macroscopic effect (also observed in Ref.…”
Section: Low-energy States With Delocalized Populations and Spectral mentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hamiltonian (A.1) (emerging from the Bogoliubov approach and leading to the diagonal form (10)) thus predicts a spectral collapse of the energy levels for W 2 → U a U b . This mechanism is discussed in detail in [30] and [31]. The resulting macroscopic effect (also observed in Ref.…”
Section: Low-energy States With Delocalized Populations and Spectral mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…( 14), (N aR , N bL ) = (0, 0), ( levels for W 2 → U a U b . This mechanism is discussed in detail in [30] and [31]. The resulting macroscopic effect (also observed in Ref.…”
Section: Low-energy States With Delocalized Populations and Spectral ...mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…This is the case for nonlinear BH-like models but also for models describing matter-photon interactions whose nonlinearity is inherent in the spinor form of their Schrödinger problem. Several examples are known such as the transition to the super-radiant phase in the Dicke model, exhibiting the emergence of a quasicontinuous spectrum [26], and the interaction-induced spectral collapse characterizing the two-photon quantum Rabi model [27] in which the Hamiltonian becomes unitarily equivalent to a noncompact generator of su(1,1) [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the set of atomic states {| } f ñ k comes from having made use of a shorthand notation for the basis (8)- (10), namely, we have labeled…”
Section: Purity and Concurrencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The JCM has become the source of inspiration for a wide variety of generalizations dealing with more general and/or realistic circumstances. The majority of them focused primarily upon multi-photon transitions and/or multimode fields [4][5][6]; engineering nonlinear atom-field couplings, like the Buck-Sukumar and Kochetov models [7,8] (including some very recent improvements and extensions of the former with or without applying the rotating wave approximation [9,10]), oneatom JC models involving two-photon interaction with intensity-dependence both in the atom-field coupling and the detuning [11,12], or adding nonlinear Kerr-like media [13][14][15][16]; interacting or noninteracting two two-level atoms [17][18][19][20]; or even more complex systems involving a large group of N twolevel (or multi-level) atoms in the same cavity, such as the socalled Tavis-Cummings model [21,22], to mention some examples. And still more recently, renewed attention has been paid to quantum decoherence and entanglement properties of light-matter interaction models à la Jaynes-Cummings whose central system is composed of two or three two-level atoms (also called within the jargon of the quantum information framework as two-or three-qubit systems) resonantly coupled with a cavity field prepared in a single number state and also with each other through dipole-dipole and Ising-like interactions [23,24] (incidentally, spin-spin interactions such as these or similar have also been the theme of current interest in a manifold of areas such as optical lattices [25]; systems with trapped ions [26] and microcavities [27]; and, even in the context of nearly localized and dipolarly coupled two identical molecules [28,29], where, under certain conditions, from an algebraic-structure point of view, intramolecular coupling models à la Jaynes-Cummings emerge); moreover, along this line an interesting application based on the resonant two-atom JCM has been proposed with the aim of implementing novel protocols for unambiguous Bell state discrimination for two qubits [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%