2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.04.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The stylohyoid chain: CT imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
15
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
15
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In the previous studies with 3D-CT, the normal range of the length of SHC was reported as 20-40 mm and 21-30 mm (11, 12). In the present study, the normal range was found as 19-28 mm and the mean length was 22.25 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the previous studies with 3D-CT, the normal range of the length of SHC was reported as 20-40 mm and 21-30 mm (11, 12). In the present study, the normal range was found as 19-28 mm and the mean length was 22.25 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In the present study, this range was found as 63°-69°. Decreased angles may cause close contact between the SHC and the internal carotid artery, while increased angles may cause a compression on the external carotid artery (12). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7] The SP fracture has also been reported to occur secondary to the fracture of the mandible. A hypothesis has been put forth which states that a SP fracture occurs in association with a mandible fracture when the direction of force is from one side and contact occurs between the cranial end of the fractured ramus and the SP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While, segmentation is diagnosed by visualization of the usually smooth bony cortex at both ends. [7] However, if the patient presents immediately after the injury, the associated facial injury may divert the attention of the physician resulting in delayed diagnosis and treatment of the underlying SP fracture. In this clinical report, left SP showed evidence of fracture in the proximal part [Figure 2a], while on right side SP showed pseudosegmentation [Figure 2b].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a possible explanation as to why there are diff erence in measurements obtained between OPG and CBCT. Furthermore, a research done by Ramadan et al, (2007) 14) shows that although OPG has the ability to determine the variations of SP, they are unable to show the orientation and dimensions of this bone. In Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3 showing measurement of right and left SP in OPG and CBCT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%