1989
DOI: 10.1051/forest:19890307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The study of tree fine root distribution and dynamics using a combined trench and observation window method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A much larger size of the root system compared to the crown area was already reported for deciduous trees by Stout (1956) who found a mean ratio of 4.5:1 for crown versus root system area. For Fagus, Quercus and Tilia, we found a gradual decrease in fine root density with increasing stem distance within a radius of 10 m or more, but not a strict stem-centred distribution pattern as it was observed, for example, in spruce forests by Bédéneau and Auclair (1989) and Nielsen and Mackenthun (1991). Of the species present showed Carpinus the steepest decrease in fine root biomass with increasing stem distance.…”
Section: Relationship Between Aboveground and Belowground Structuressupporting
confidence: 53%
“…A much larger size of the root system compared to the crown area was already reported for deciduous trees by Stout (1956) who found a mean ratio of 4.5:1 for crown versus root system area. For Fagus, Quercus and Tilia, we found a gradual decrease in fine root density with increasing stem distance within a radius of 10 m or more, but not a strict stem-centred distribution pattern as it was observed, for example, in spruce forests by Bédéneau and Auclair (1989) and Nielsen and Mackenthun (1991). Of the species present showed Carpinus the steepest decrease in fine root biomass with increasing stem distance.…”
Section: Relationship Between Aboveground and Belowground Structuressupporting
confidence: 53%
“…For Fraxinus, Tilia and Acer, we found a gradual decrease in fine root density with increasing stem distance within a radius of 10 m or more, but not a strict stemcentered distribution pattern as it was observed, for example, in spruce forests by Bédéneau and Auclair (1989) and Nielsen and Mackenthun (1991). Only in the case of Carpinus and Fagus trees growing in mixed stands, fine root biomass showed a steep decrease within an 8 m-radius around the stems.…”
Section: Horizontal Fine Root Distribution and Species Overlapmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…In the case of low tree density (e.g., 100 tree ha − 1 ) a minimum root reinforcement of 7 kPa requires trees with diameter larger than 0.7 m. Surprisingly, the values calculated for the two different lattice geometries (triangular or square) yield similar values of root reinforcement, with a maximum difference of less than 10%. In all the cases considered, the maximum density of fine roots was always less than 300 roots m − 2 , below the values of maximum physiological threshold reported in the literature (Bedeneau and Auclair, 1989;Müller and Wagner, 2003;Yanai et al, 2006).…”
Section: Root Systems Mechanical Interactions On Triangular or Squarementioning
confidence: 83%