2011
DOI: 10.1007/bf03340964
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Student Engagement in Schools Questionnaire (SESQ) and the Teacher Engagement Report Form-New (TERF-N): Examining the Preliminary Evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Students' disaffection showed a negative impact on their academic performance. The research works by Skinner and Belmont (1993), Hart et al (2011) and George and Childs (2012) favored this study's results and highlighted that academic performance is negatively associated with students' disaffection. Conversely, academic performance was positively related to students' self-efficacy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Students' disaffection showed a negative impact on their academic performance. The research works by Skinner and Belmont (1993), Hart et al (2011) and George and Childs (2012) favored this study's results and highlighted that academic performance is negatively associated with students' disaffection. Conversely, academic performance was positively related to students' self-efficacy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…The SESQ—Student Engagement (SESQ‐ENG; Hart Stewart, & Jimerson, 2011) was used to obtain information from the student's perspective related to both the indicators and facilitators of engagement in school. The SESQ‐ENG is a 33‐item self‐report measure that requires students to respond according to a Likert‐type scale from 1 to 5 (e.g., 1 = never , 5 = always ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SESQ‐ENG is a 33‐item self‐report measure that requires students to respond according to a Likert‐type scale from 1 to 5 (e.g., 1 = never , 5 = always ). The SESQ‐ENG demonstrates high internal consistency with Cronbach alphas ranging from .85 to .95 (Hart et al, 2011). The SESQ‐ENG is composed of five factors (Affective Engagement: Liking for Learning; Affective Engagement: Liking for School; Behavioral Engagement: Effort and Persistence; Behavioral Engagement: Extracurricular Activities; and Cognitive Engagement; Lam & Jimerson, 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For all 3 subscales, students responded on a scale ranging from (1) strongly disagree to (5) strongly agree. These scales were modified on the basis of the Hart et al 18 validated Student Engagement in Schools Questionnaire (SESQ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%