2012
DOI: 10.1080/17449480.2012.720874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Struggle for a Common Interim Reporting Frequency Regime in Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides these environmental indicators, in the present study, we also consider socioeconomic and institutional variables that represent the institutional environment [14]. The institutional variables we use are: government effectiveness, voice and accountability, political stability and control of corruption [15].…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides these environmental indicators, in the present study, we also consider socioeconomic and institutional variables that represent the institutional environment [14]. The institutional variables we use are: government effectiveness, voice and accountability, political stability and control of corruption [15].…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a more recent cross-country study, Link (2012) contributes to the disclosure literature by analysing interim reporting in 15 EU countries and the potential effects of Transparency Directive on reporting frequency (i.e. quarterly or half-yearly) in the region.…”
Section: Interim Financial Reporting Disclosure Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, LW15 choose quarterly and annual frequencies. A challenge in the international setting is that the mandatory frequency of interim reporting is not uniform across markets in different countries; moreover, some countries changed their mandatory interim financial-reporting frequency during our sample period (e.g., Link, 2012).…”
Section: Data and Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%