The Struggle Against Sweatshops: Moving Toward Responsible Global Business

Abstract

Today’s sweatshops violate our notions of justice, yet they continue to flourish. This is so because we have not settled on criteria that would allow us to condemn and do away with them and because the poor working conditions in certain places are preferable to the alternative of no job at all. In this paper, we examine these phenomena. We consider the definitional dilemmas posed by sweatshops by routing a standard definition of sweatshops through the precepts put forward in the literature on justice and virtue ethics. We conclude that fixing on definitions is pointless and misleading and that we are better off looking at whether or not a workplace violates the basic human rights of workers and whether or not the working conditions there cohere with situations on which we have already rendered judgments. In the end, we suggest guidelines for businesses that operate in the global workplace to help them avoid charges of running sweatshops. These recommendations account for the harsh living conditions in certain developing and emerging countries as well as the norms of societies in developed countries. Copyright Springer 2006business ethics, corporate culture, justice, stakeholder theory, sweatshops, work environment,

From conspicuous to considered fashion: A harm-chain approach to the responsibilities of luxury-fashion businesses

“…The 'multi-stakeholder approach' (Hughes, 2001) can enable the identification of such stakeholder relationships, as it proposes that the corporate sector, NGOs, trade unions, and national government be brought together and analysed as a formal organisation to engender more responsible business, which in turn engages those who create harm, those who are harmed, and those who regulate harm (Polonsky et al, 2003). The ETI discussed earlier is one of the most prominent Therefore, in the context of luxury fashion, leveraging stakeholder relationships to facilitate change for good might involve worker education, lobbying governments to raise legal working conditions, or inspiring luxury customers to take an interest in, and influence the provenance of the products they buy (Smith et al, 2010;Radin & Calkins, 2006). Figure 1 can assist in this process by identifying where harms occur, and where the influence of luxury fashion brand owners will have most policies; by ensuring apparel factories operate under fair working conditions; by investing in the education and development of the communities in which they manufacture their goods; by communicating these mechanisms in a transparent way to consumers; and by partnering with NGOs for long-term change (Defra, 2010;Hughes, 2001;Yu, 2008).…”

“…It is widely noted in studies of fashion purchase behaviour that the consumer's personal fashion-garment wants and demands take precedence over ethical concerns, but due to a lack of knowledge surrounding the production conditions where the majority of fashion garments are now manufactured, and the lack of readily available information on brand sourcing policies (Shaw et al, 2006), many consumers often feel unable to make ethical choices when it comes to clothing (Iwanow et al, 2005;Joergens, 2006;Radin & Calkins, 2006). One major ethical issue that many consumers across the fashion market spectrum are more aware of is sweatshop labour (de Brito et al, 2008;Dickson, 2005;Shaw et.…”

The Effect of Perceived Corruption on Entrepreneurial Intention: Evidence from Italy

“…Griffiths et al (2009) demonstrate that corruption considerably reduces the interest and desirability to start a new business activity. Many other authors have highlighted the problems created by corruption in different counties; acts of fraud (Cohen et al, 2010;Chwastiak, 2013), health and safety violations (Radin & Calkins, 2006), and tax evasion (Everett et al, 2007;Otusanya, 2011) are just few examples of activities that privilege self-interests over social ones. Corruption is an environmental factor that should have negative effect on people's actions.…”

The Battle for Business Ethics: A Struggle Theory

“…Academic articles also cite the term struggle frequently, such as ''ethics and compliance officers […] struggle with internal legitimacy'' (Treviño et al 2014, p. 187), ''multinational businesses […] struggle with employment practice issues'' (Treviño and Brown 2004, p. 69), and a ''manager struggles with trying to find moral justified way (Velasquez 2000, p. 350). Dey (2007) uses the term in the subtitle of his article ''Social accounting at Traidcraft: a struggle for the meaning of fair trade,'' whereas the title of Radin and Calkins's (2006) even reads ''The struggle against sweatshops.'' A management book has also recently been published with the title ''The good struggle'' (Badaracco 2013).…”