2022
DOI: 10.1039/d1dt03109k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The structures of ring-expanded NHC supported copper(i) triphenylstannyls and their phenyl transfer reactivity towards heterocumulenes

Abstract: Three ring-expanded N-heterocyclic carbene-supported copper(I) triphenylstannyls have been synthesised by the reaction of (RE-NHC)CuOtBu with triphenylstannane (RE-NHC = 6-Mes, 6-Dipp, 7-Dipp). The compounds were characterised by NMR spectroscopy and X-ray...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(42 reference statements)
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These metrics are similar to those previously observed for (NHC)CuEPh 3 systems (E = Si, Sn); in particular, Kleeberg 4 reported a corresponding silicon system for IPr ( i.e. the lighter congener of 2 ), its tin analogue was reported by Sadighi 14 and the heavier congeners of 3 and 4 were described by us 16 (relevant bond lengths (Å) and angles (°): (IPr)CuSiPh 3 , C–Cu, 1.9333(1); C–Cu–Si, 170.53(4); (IPr)CuSnPh 3 , C–Cu, 1.914(2); C–Cu–Sn, 169.6(8); (6-Mes)CuSnPh 3 , C–Cu, 1.927(3); C–Cu–Sn, 172.87(10); (6-Dipp)CuSnPh 3 , C–Cu, 1.934(3); C–Cu–Sn, 171.27(9)). 4,14,16 Comparison of the Cu–Ge bond distances between 1–4 show only limited variations as a consequence of the identity of the NHC, whereas comparison of 2 to (IPr)CuSiPh 3 and (IPr)CuSnPh 3 (Cu–E bond length (Å): 2 , 2.3038(3), 2.3085(3); (IPr)CuSiPh 3 , 1.9333(1); (IPr)CuSnPh 3 , 2.469(5)) exhibit unsurprising trends in the Cu–E bond lengths.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These metrics are similar to those previously observed for (NHC)CuEPh 3 systems (E = Si, Sn); in particular, Kleeberg 4 reported a corresponding silicon system for IPr ( i.e. the lighter congener of 2 ), its tin analogue was reported by Sadighi 14 and the heavier congeners of 3 and 4 were described by us 16 (relevant bond lengths (Å) and angles (°): (IPr)CuSiPh 3 , C–Cu, 1.9333(1); C–Cu–Si, 170.53(4); (IPr)CuSnPh 3 , C–Cu, 1.914(2); C–Cu–Sn, 169.6(8); (6-Mes)CuSnPh 3 , C–Cu, 1.927(3); C–Cu–Sn, 172.87(10); (6-Dipp)CuSnPh 3 , C–Cu, 1.934(3); C–Cu–Sn, 171.27(9)). 4,14,16 Comparison of the Cu–Ge bond distances between 1–4 show only limited variations as a consequence of the identity of the NHC, whereas comparison of 2 to (IPr)CuSiPh 3 and (IPr)CuSnPh 3 (Cu–E bond length (Å): 2 , 2.3038(3), 2.3085(3); (IPr)CuSiPh 3 , 1.9333(1); (IPr)CuSnPh 3 , 2.469(5)) exhibit unsurprising trends in the Cu–E bond lengths.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…the lighter congener of 2 ), its tin analogue was reported by Sadighi 14 and the heavier congeners of 3 and 4 were described by us 16 (relevant bond lengths (Å) and angles (°): (IPr)CuSiPh 3 , C–Cu, 1.9333(1); C–Cu–Si, 170.53(4); (IPr)CuSnPh 3 , C–Cu, 1.914(2); C–Cu–Sn, 169.6(8); (6-Mes)CuSnPh 3 , C–Cu, 1.927(3); C–Cu–Sn, 172.87(10); (6-Dipp)CuSnPh 3 , C–Cu, 1.934(3); C–Cu–Sn, 171.27(9)). 4,14,16 Comparison of the Cu–Ge bond distances between 1–4 show only limited variations as a consequence of the identity of the NHC, whereas comparison of 2 to (IPr)CuSiPh 3 and (IPr)CuSnPh 3 (Cu–E bond length (Å): 2 , 2.3038(3), 2.3085(3); (IPr)CuSiPh 3 , 1.9333(1); (IPr)CuSnPh 3 , 2.469(5)) exhibit unsurprising trends in the Cu–E bond lengths. A similar, predictable, lengthening of the Cu–E bond length when comparing 3 or 4 to their corresponding tin congeners (6-Dipp)CuSnPh 3 and (6-Mes)CuSnPh 3 is also observed (Cu–E bond length (Å): 3 , 2.3045(3); (6-Mes)CuSnPh 3 , 2.4567(4); 4 , 2.3456(12); (6-Dipp)CuSnPh 3 , 2.4742(4)).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations