2022
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.832503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Structured Mind at Rest: Low-Frequency Oscillations Reflect Interactive Dynamics Between Spontaneous Brain Activity and a Common Architecture for Task Control

Abstract: The Common Model of Cognition (CMC) has been proposed as a high level framework through which functional neuroimaging data can be predicted and interpreted. Previous work has found the CMC is capable of predicting brain activity across a variety of tasks, but it has not been tested on resting state data. This paper adapts a previously used method for comparing theoretical models of brain structure, Dynamic Causal Modeling, for the task-free environment of resting state, and compares the CMC against six alterna… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(90 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the present study cautiously suggests these relationships, it is important to test these model predictions specifically with a priori hypotheses in future studies. One explicit way to test these predictions in future resting state or task-based studies could be through Dynamic Causal Modeling (DCM), which could directly assess the validity of the Do-GooD model compared to other possible formulations ( Friston et al, 2013 ; Sibert et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the present study cautiously suggests these relationships, it is important to test these model predictions specifically with a priori hypotheses in future studies. One explicit way to test these predictions in future resting state or task-based studies could be through Dynamic Causal Modeling (DCM), which could directly assess the validity of the Do-GooD model compared to other possible formulations ( Friston et al, 2013 ; Sibert et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the images were then smoothed with an isotropic 8.0 mm full‐width half‐maximum Gaussian kernel. Although other preprocessing steps are often carried out (e.g., linear regression of motion components and removal of frequencies in the range of physiological noise as done in Sibert, Hake, & Stocco, 2022), they were omitted in this analysis to make it directly comparable to the original data of Stocco et al. (2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%