“…It is now well-established that the unfolded state of peptides and proteins is not as conformationally random as suggested by the random coil model, − which basically assumes that each amino acid besides proline equally populates a rather broad region in the upper left quadrant of the Ramachandran plot (−180° ≤ Φ ≤ −50° and 90° ≤ ψ ≤ 180°, region I), a slightly less extended trough located below the interface between upper and lower left quadrants (−180° ≤ Φ ≤ −30° and −80° ≤ ψ ≤ 30°; region II), and a more restricted one in the upper right quadrant (60° ≤ Φ ≤ 90° and 0° ≤ ψ ≤ 60°, region III). − Numerous experimental data as well as results obtained from the analysis of truncated coil libraries suggest that most amino acid residues have a strong preference for region I, whereas region II is much less populated than predicted by the random coil model. ,− However, some amino acid residues, such as serine, cysteine, threonine, asparagine, and particularly aspartic acid, the side chains of which all can either donate or accept hydrogen bonding, do not belong in this category, owing to their relatively strong preference for structures that appear in various turns or can themselves be considered as turns. , Conformational analyses of short peptides further indicate that region I contains at least two distinguishable subregions associated with polyproline II (pPII) and β-strand conformations (−100° ≤ Φ ≤ −60°, 130° ≤ ψ ≤ 180° and −180° ≤ Φ ≤ −100°, 90° ≤ ψ ≤ 180°, respectively). ,,,,− Different amino acid residues have been shown to exhibit different populations of pPII and β-strand. Alanine, for instance, has a very high propensity for pPII, whereas phenylalanine and valine have a higher preference for β-strand-like conformations. , …”