“…Deletion of individual NGL genes does not impair 39-end maturation of 25S rRNA+ RNA isolated from the wild-type parental strain (lane 2) and the various ngl⌬ derivatives (lanes 3-5) was separated on a 1+2% agarose gel, blotted, and hybridized with a probe spanning the mature 39 end of 25S rRNA+ RNA isolated from an rnt1⌬ strain was used as a control (lane 1 subcellular localization of the protein remains to be established+ We have noted the presence of a strong consensus nuclear localization signal spanning residues 41-53 of Ngl2p (HKKKGKKGKKSKPI), suggesting that the protein resides in the nucle(ol)us+ Nevertheless, cytoplasmic localization of Ngl2p can not be excluded, because it is known that 60S subunits containing 39-extended forms of 5+8S rRNA can be exported from the nucleus (Briggs et al+, 1998)+ According to the model of Yeh and Lee (1990) ITS2 folds into a set of helical segments encompassing almost the whole of the spacer (Fig+ 4A)+ The 39 end of the 5+8S ϩ 30 species, the first distinct intermediate in the maturation of the 7S precursor, is located at the end of the first of these helices (helix II), which includes the terminal 2 nt of 5+8S rRNA+ Although this might explain why at this stage processing is taken over by another exonuclease, the exosome apparently is quite capable of progressing through helix IV, which is at least as, if not more, stable than helix II+ It seems more likely, therefore, that the handover (Allmang et al+, 1999) is necessitated by the decreasing distance to helix I formed by the base-paired 39 and 59 ends of 5+8S and 25S rRNAs, respectively, and ribosomal proteins associated with this structure+ Helix I has indeed been assigned a crucial role in the formation of the largesubunit rRNAs, but its disturbance already blocks the first step in ITS2 processing, that is, cleavage at C2 (Peculis & Greer, 1998;Côté & Peculis, 2001)+ Thus, it is unclear to what extent this helix is important in 39-end formation of 5+8S rRNA+ The absence of any sequence-specific recognition elements in helix I suggests that it does not act itself as a binding site for r-protein(s)+ However, this does not exclude the proximity effect as an explanation for the nuclease handover observed in 7S r 5+8S processing+…”