1993
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.bb.22.060193.001503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Structure of the Four-Way Junction in DNA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
134
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
7
134
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1c, for example, the pair of helices form an acute angle of 60Њ, with the backbone of one helix fitting snugly into the grooves of the other; this type of structure was seen in several crystals, with the acute angle ranging from 43Њ to 77Њ (6). A pair of DNA helices with a backbone-groove fit was also deduced earlier through a variety of measurements in solution for the Holliday junction, a four-way DNA junction involved in DNA recombination (7)(8)(9)(10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 58%
“…1c, for example, the pair of helices form an acute angle of 60Њ, with the backbone of one helix fitting snugly into the grooves of the other; this type of structure was seen in several crystals, with the acute angle ranging from 43Њ to 77Њ (6). A pair of DNA helices with a backbone-groove fit was also deduced earlier through a variety of measurements in solution for the Holliday junction, a four-way DNA junction involved in DNA recombination (7)(8)(9)(10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 58%
“…This effect is maximized at 4° C, where the observed increase in friction constant is about 38%, compared with 23% at 25° C. Thus, there is a preferred pair of stacking domains for both domains of the 4-arm junction, which is well known. 25,26 This double stacking dominance seems to be unique to the 4-arm junction.…”
Section: Ferguson Analysismentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Junction C is an immobile junction, and it serves as a control for the patterns seen there. Crossover residues [123, 124] of strand II are protected, as are residues [12,13] of strand I, but helical residues [9,10], and [83, 84] of strand II show no protection. These data confirm that the molecule constructed has the conformation indicated at the top of Figure 2, and it is poised to branch migrate following restriction.…”
Section: Hydroxyl Radical Autofootprintingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the new numbering scheme, the crossover the crossover at junction B occurred before restriction at [14,15] on strand ii and at [30,31] on strand iii. Figure 6a shows that the key protection on strand ii has shifted to [9,10] and the major protection on strand iii has shifted to [25,26]; these crossover sites correspond to junction B′ (Figure 2). Thus, this junction has also migrated 5 positions through the symmetric region; however, the crossover strands have migrated in the 5′ direction, rather than the 3′ direction, as in junction A′.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%