1995
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The structure of psychological well-being revisited.

Abstract: A theoretical model of psychological well-being that encompasses 6 distinct dimensions of wellness (Autonomy, Environmental Mastery, Personal Growth, Positive Relations With Others, Purpose in Life, Self-Acceptance) was tested with data from a nationally representative sample of adults (iV-1,108), aged 25 and older, who participated in telephone interviews. Confirmatory factor analyses provided support for the proposed 6-factor model, with a single second-order super factor. The model was superior in fit over … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

146
4,844
25
724

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6,324 publications
(5,739 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
146
4,844
25
724
Order By: Relevance
“…These short-form scales had previously confirmed the proposed theoretical structure of PWB and replicated age and gender differences in a separate, nationally representative sample (see Ryff & Keyes, 1995). Consistent with this prior investigation, the reduced-item scales in this study exhibited lower to modest internal (alpha) reliabilities (see Table 2).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…These short-form scales had previously confirmed the proposed theoretical structure of PWB and replicated age and gender differences in a separate, nationally representative sample (see Ryff & Keyes, 1995). Consistent with this prior investigation, the reduced-item scales in this study exhibited lower to modest internal (alpha) reliabilities (see Table 2).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The joint work of Keyes and Ryff led to a combined definition of well-being incorporating: (1) emotional well-being (positive emotions and life satisfaction), (2) psychological well-being (consisting of Ryff's (1989) six dimensions), and (3) social well-being (consisting of Keyesā€™s five dimensions). This conceptualization bridged the gap between hedonic and eudaimonic models (Keyes, 2002; Ryff & Keyes, 1995). More recently, another proposal by Seligman (2011) also brought to the debate the two traditions together.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Study populations consisted of African American (M = 10%), Asian (M = 6%), Caucasian (M = 63%), Hispanic (M = (Ryff & Keyes, 1995) Dykens et al (2014) Self-compassion Self-Compassion Scale (SCS) (Neff, 2003) Benn et al (2012 17%), and Multi-Cultural (M = 2%) participants. Native American and (not specified) Indian racial groups were underrepresented in study samples.…”
Section: Participant Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%