1986
DOI: 10.2307/2392790
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Structure of Opportunity: How Promotion Ladders Vary Within and Among Organizations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
181
1
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 358 publications
(194 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
9
181
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Job embeddedness may be lower for females, as family obligations may cause interruptions in employment, disrupting the formation and degree of links and fit between females and the organization. Similarly, family obligations may prompt a greater percentage of females to accept part-time and temporary employment, creating a concentration of females in jobs without formal career ladders (Baron, Davis-Blake, & Bielby, 1986). Altogether, this suggests that average age and proportion of female employees will share negative and positive associations with turnover rates, respectively.…”
Section: Job Embeddedness Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Job embeddedness may be lower for females, as family obligations may cause interruptions in employment, disrupting the formation and degree of links and fit between females and the organization. Similarly, family obligations may prompt a greater percentage of females to accept part-time and temporary employment, creating a concentration of females in jobs without formal career ladders (Baron, Davis-Blake, & Bielby, 1986). Altogether, this suggests that average age and proportion of female employees will share negative and positive associations with turnover rates, respectively.…”
Section: Job Embeddedness Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Employers are no more monolithic than unions: certain employers are likely to support particular bene ts while others do not (e.g., see Baron, et al 1986). Some organizational researchers have, for example, predicted that the proportion of women-as either workers or employerslikely shapes the availability and provision of work-family bene ts.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Job-specific education is positively correlated with union membership, whereas overall general education is negatively correlated with union membership (Hundley, 1989). Job-specific training enhances the value of union membership in terms of increased wages gained through collective bargaining, whereas general education increases job mobility (Baron, Davis-Blake and Bielby, 1986;Hundley, 1989). Thus, controlling for occupational differences, more highly educated individuals were more likely to be union members (Hundley, 1988).…”
Section: Individual-level Demographic Differencesmentioning
confidence: 97%