2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2004.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The structure of infant cognition at 1 year

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously, we found that the measures from our battery form differentiated dimensions of cognition in infancy (Rose, Feldman, & Jankowski, 2004, 2005b), and that latent variables reflecting these dimensions predict later general cognitive ability (MDI) at 24 and 36 months, (Rose, Feldman, Jankowski et al, 2005; Rose et al, 2008). Here, we examine the extent to which measures from this battery collectively account for contemporaneous measures of general cognitive ability at 24 and 36 months.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Previously, we found that the measures from our battery form differentiated dimensions of cognition in infancy (Rose, Feldman, & Jankowski, 2004, 2005b), and that latent variables reflecting these dimensions predict later general cognitive ability (MDI) at 24 and 36 months, (Rose, Feldman, Jankowski et al, 2005; Rose et al, 2008). Here, we examine the extent to which measures from this battery collectively account for contemporaneous measures of general cognitive ability at 24 and 36 months.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Houses were chosen as a control stimulus because they share properties of symmetry and configuration with faces. Recent analyses of the underlying factors influencing performance in infant studies indicate that different factors account for habituation and recognition memory, confirming the importance of providing separate estimates of these abilities (Rose, Feldman, & Jankowski, 2004, 2005). To measure other aspects of development (including social and communicative abilities), we used information from the Mullen Scales of Early Learning (Mullen, 1997), the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (Sparrow et al, 1984), and the Autism Diagnostic Observation Scale (ADOS; Lord, Rutter, DiLavore, & Risi, 1999), which were administered to the children as part of a larger study.…”
Section: Current Studymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…(Shorter look durations and faster shift rates are associated with better attention.) Tasks were made age appropriate as the infants grew older by shortening presentation and test times, increasing the stringency of learning criteria, or increasing stimulus complexity (for more details, see Rose, Feldman, & Jankowski, 2005a, 2005b, 2009Rose, Feldman, Jankowski, & Van Rossem, 2008).…”
Section: Procedure: Information Processing Tasks In the Infant And Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The early measures of memory, processing speed, and attention have previously been found to form separate constructs (Rose, Feldman, & Jankowski, 2004, 2005b) 1 and to relate to more mature instantiations of the same constructs in preadolescence (Rose et al, 2012).…”
Section: Procedure: Information Processing Tasks In the Infant And Tomentioning
confidence: 99%