The technique of disulfide scrambling permits reversible conversion of the native and denatured (scrambled) proteins via shuffling and reshuffling of disulfide bonds. Under strong denaturing conditions (e.g. 6 M guanidinium chloride) and in the presence of a thiol initiator, ␣-lactalbumin (␣LA) denatures by shuffling its four native disulfide bonds and converts to an assembly of 45 species of scrambled isomers. Among them, two predominant isomers, designated as X-␣LA-a and X-␣LA-d, account for about 50% of the total denatured structure of ␣LA. X-␣LA-a and X-␣LA-d, which adopt the disulfide patterns of (1-2,3-4,5-6,7-8) and (1-2,3-6,4 -5,7-8), respectively, represent the most unfolded structures among the 104 possible scrambled isomers (Chang, J.-Y., and Li, L. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 9705-9712). In this study, X-␣LA-a and X-␣LA-d were purified and allowed to refold through disulfide scrambling to form the native ␣LA. Folding intermediates were trapped kinetically by acid quenching and analyzed quantitatively by reversed phase high pressure liquid chromatography. The results revealed two major on-pathway productive intermediates, two major off-pathway kinetic traps, and at least 30 additional minor transient intermediates. Of the two major on-pathway intermediates, one takes on a native-like ␣-helical domain, and the other comprises a structured -sheet, calcium binding domain. The two major kinetic traps are apparently stabilized by locally formed non-native-like structures. Overall, the folding mechanism of ␣LA is essentially congruent with the model of "folding funnel" furnished with a rather intricate energy landscape.Most nascent polypeptides need to navigate their way to form the native, biologically active structures. Elucidation of the molecular mechanism and pathway of this folding process is of fundamental importance in biological science (1-14). Experimentally, it also represents one of the most daunting challenges to protein chemists and structural biologists. At present, the pathway of protein folding can be elucidated by two general methods. The most widely adopted conventional approach is to unfold proteins in the presence of strong denaturant (e.g. 8 M urea or 6 M GdmCl) 1 or by extreme pH and temperature.Following the removal of denaturant (e.g. by gel filtration, dilution, or dialysis), pH jump, or temperature jump, denatured proteins usually refold spontaneously to form the native structure. The pathway of protein refolding is then monitored by the mechanism of restoration of some physicochemical signals that distinguish the native and unfolded states. The most commonly used signals are spectra of fluorescence, circular dichroism (15), infrared (16, 17), UV, and NMR (18 -21), coupled with amide-proton exchange. This method is most versatile and can be practically applied to study folding behaviors of any protein. However, it does not permit, in most cases, isolation of folding intermediates. To date, the vast majority of our knowledge about protein folding has been acquired by the applicatio...