2020
DOI: 10.1029/2019rg000657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Structure of Climate Variability Across Scales

Abstract: One of the most intriguing facets of the climate system is that it exhibits variability across all temporal and spatial scales; pronounced examples are temperature and precipitation. The structure of this variability, however, is not arbitrary. Over certain spatial and temporal ranges, it can be described by scaling relationships in the form of power laws in probability density distributions and autocorrelation functions. These scaling relationships can be quantified by scaling exponents which measure how the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
68
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 313 publications
(414 reference statements)
0
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This first challenge I see is to better understand processes behind the background variability which is "red noise like" in Mitchell (1976) and encompasses different regimes in . Franzke et al (2019) describe the different ways (multifractal cascading processes, state-dependent noise, etc.) of how scaling behavior can appear in time series.…”
Section: Discussion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This first challenge I see is to better understand processes behind the background variability which is "red noise like" in Mitchell (1976) and encompasses different regimes in . Franzke et al (2019) describe the different ways (multifractal cascading processes, state-dependent noise, etc.) of how scaling behavior can appear in time series.…”
Section: Discussion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "background and peaks" paradigm clearly has a problem with the explanation of the background signal and also regarding the amplitude of the variability on longer than millennial timescales (Lovejoy, 2015). On the other hand, the scaling paradigm needs a better connection to physical processes beyond the weather regime (Franzke et al, 2019). Both paradigms are also limited to temporal variability and do not address spatial patterns associated with the climate system variability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For estimating the extremal index, we use the interval method described by Ferro and Segers (2003) trueθ˜=2{}false∑i=1N1false(Ti1false)2false(N1false)false∑i=1N1false(Ti1false)false(Ti2false), where N is the number of extremes and T i is the time between the ( i + 1)th and i th extremes. The extremal index has a value range between 0 and 1, where a value of 1 indicates that the extremes occur independently from each other, while a value smaller than 1 means that they appear in clusters and there is temporal dependency, with long‐range dependence (Franzke et al., 2020) for a value of 0. See Ferro and Segers (2003) for more details.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This first challenge I see is to better understand processes behind the background variability which is 'red noise like' in Mitchell (1976) and encompasses all variability in ; Rypdal and Rypdal (2014). Franzke and coauthors (2019) describe the different ways (multifractal cascading processes, state-dependent noise, etc.) how scaling behavior can appear in time series.…”
Section: Discussion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and also regarding the amplitude of the variability on longer than millennial time scales. On the other hand, the scaling paradigm is quite abstract and lacks a clear connection to physical processes beyond the weather regime (Franzke and coauthors, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%