The structure of bio-information-nano technology convergence from firms’ perspective

Abstract

Purpose – This study aims to contribute to the comprehension of managerial implications in all the new convergences fields: bioinformation technology (BIT), nanoinformation technology (NIT), nanobiotechnology (NBT) and bioinformation–nanotechnology (BINT). The phenomenon of convergence that significantly impacted economies and societies in the information technology era has continued to be combined with new technologies such as nanotechnology and biotechnology. Many countries have tried to seize the initiative to strengthen the future competitiveness, and it become increasingly important for roles of companies to expand applications of the new convergence. Design/methodology/approach – From a company-based perspective, the study quantifies leading companies’ degree of influence in each convergence field. Findings – However, the result shows that companies’ influences are not mature enough to transfer the initiatives from both the NBT and BINT convergence fields. In addition, this study presents a perceivable framework for companies/institutions by identifying which technological fields the companies/institutions are influential in and what degrees of technological impact are shaped among them. As a result, this allows companies/institutions to recognize their environments squarely. Originality/value – This study applied the replacement process that can reinforce the investigation of the extent to which a firm has a significant ability to influence others directly and indirectly. From the methodology perspective, such replacement can intensely display the structure and the extent of competition among firms. Therefore, the results provide an explicit information to understand the overall business situation. Paper type – Research paper

Understanding the Dynamic Convergence Phenomenon from the Perspective of Diversity and Persistence: A Cross-Sector Comparative Analysis between the United States and South Korea

“…We operationalize our framework in the case of the information and communication technology (ICT), biotechnology (BT), and nanotechnology (NT) sectors of the United States (US) and South Korea (Korea). The main reason we choose these three technology sectors is that they are under the global spotlight as the growth engines of nations [ 43 – 48 ]. Moreover, the US plays an important role in leading these technology sectors and has contributed considerably to the birth of these sectors compared to other countries [ 49 – 50 ].…”

Russian S&T Foresight 2030: case of nanotechnologies and new materials

“…The largest breakthroughs of the next decade may include the molecular production of macroscopic objects (“desktop nanofactories”) and the emergence of atomic design. The convergence of nano-, info-, bio- and cognitive technologies may potentially lead to extending the active stage of human life by dint of 3D bioprinting, targeted drug delivery and other solutions (Kim et al , 2014; Roco, 2015).…”

A New Measurement to Understand Convergence Phenomenon

“…Although there was little difference between the US and the European approaches, both concentrated on the importance of NBIC technologies and supported technological convergence processes between them (Coenen, 2008). Since the U.S's initiative on converging technologies began, the governmentdriven overarching strategic plans have continuously pushed forward for 10 years while other countries such as those in the EU, Japan, and South Korea have aggressively concentrated on not falling behind in the competition (Kim et al, 2012).…”