1982
DOI: 10.1038/296466a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The structure of a pseudo intercalated complex between actinomycin and the DNA binding sequence d(GpC)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Housing of G (purine) and Cy (pyrimidine) into the adjacent large cavities allows location of these N-bases at such distances of one another that the lengths of the H-bonds between them (nm, 0.287, 0.295, and 0.288) almost coincide with those calculated earlier in (White et al 1978) (nm, 0.293, 0.296, and0.293) andin (Yčas 1969) (nm, 0.284, 0.292, and0.284) on the basis of X-ray measurements of crystallized DNA double helixes. Housing of G and DDR radicals into the adjacent large and small cavities, respectively, allows their arrangement within these cavities with no structural destruction at a distance of 0.148 nm ; this distance correlates well with the G-DDR chemical bond length (0.151 nm) calculated from the X-ray study of crystallized DNA double helixes (Takusagawa et al 1982). Meanwhile, housing of two purine N-bases into the gashydrate adjacent large cavities leads to a significant tension of the structure and to its partial destruction.…”
Section: Observations and Simulations Counting In Favor Of The Loh-thmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Housing of G (purine) and Cy (pyrimidine) into the adjacent large cavities allows location of these N-bases at such distances of one another that the lengths of the H-bonds between them (nm, 0.287, 0.295, and 0.288) almost coincide with those calculated earlier in (White et al 1978) (nm, 0.293, 0.296, and0.293) andin (Yčas 1969) (nm, 0.284, 0.292, and0.284) on the basis of X-ray measurements of crystallized DNA double helixes. Housing of G and DDR radicals into the adjacent large and small cavities, respectively, allows their arrangement within these cavities with no structural destruction at a distance of 0.148 nm ; this distance correlates well with the G-DDR chemical bond length (0.151 nm) calculated from the X-ray study of crystallized DNA double helixes (Takusagawa et al 1982). Meanwhile, housing of two purine N-bases into the gashydrate adjacent large cavities leads to a significant tension of the structure and to its partial destruction.…”
Section: Observations and Simulations Counting In Favor Of The Loh-thmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Some of the structures are specifically labeled as unusual in the Nucleic Acid Database (Berman et al, 1992), while others have been identified on the basis of unusual features in selected helical structures. The examples span the gamut from free and drug- bound dinucleoside monophosphates (Seeman et al, 197 1;Rubin et al, 1972;Neidle et al, 1978;Takusagawa et al, 1982) to longer chains with hairpin loops and/or singlestranded unpaired bases (Robertus et d., 1974;Chattopadhyaya et al, 1988;Joshua-Tor et al, 1992). The modeling points to a potential new role for the unusual backbone conformations observed experimentally, while the correspondence between predicted and solved structures provides an added measure of confidence in the computational approach.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Solution studies are consistent with intercalation as a mode of binding and reveal a preference for guanine-pyrimidine sequences (1,(5)(6)(7)(8)(9). Crystallographic studies have provided some insight into the nature of the specific guanine-actinomycin interaction (10,11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%