The Structural Virality of Online Diffusion

Abstract

V iral products and ideas are intuitively understood to grow through a person-to-person diffusion process analogous to the spread of an infectious disease; however, until recently it has been prohibitively difficult to directly observe purportedly viral events, and thus to rigorously quantify or characterize their structural properties. Here we propose a formal measure of what we label "structural virality" that interpolates between two conceptual extremes: content that gains its popularity through a single, large broadcast and that which grows through multiple generations with any one individual directly responsible for only a fraction of the total adoption. We use this notion of structural virality to analyze a unique data set of a billion diffusion events on Twitter, including the propagation of news stories, videos, images, and petitions. We find that across all domains and all sizes of events, online diffusion is characterized by surprising structural diversity; that is, popular events regularly grow via both broadcast and viral mechanisms, as well as essentially all conceivable combinations of the two. Nevertheless, we find that structural virality is typically low, and remains so independent of size, suggesting that popularity is largely driven by the size of the largest broadcast. Finally, we attempt to replicate these findings with a model of contagion characterized by a low infection rate spreading on a scale-free network. We find that although several of our empirical findings are consistent with such a model, it fails to replicate the observed diversity of structural virality, thereby suggesting new directions for future modeling efforts.

How did Ebola Information Spread on Twitter: Broadcasting or Viral Spreading? (Preprint)

“…As defined by Goel et al [4], the structural virality of an information cascade is defined as the average distance between all pairs of nodes (Twitter users in this case) in the cascade.…”

“…In the pre-social media age, largescale distribution of health information relied on broadcast media, such as newspaper and television. Mass media or marketing efforts rely on what might be termed a "broadcast" diffusion model, indicating that a large number of individuals receive the information directly from the same source [4].…”

Can Digital Technologies Create a Stronger Model for Democratic Participation? The Case of #Crowdlaw

“…The failure of the CrowdLaw platforms in this study to generate anything resembling robust participation stands as a stark reminder of a ubiquitous reality that is often overshadowed by our everyday experience of Internet virality: while in theory the Internet connects everyone who has an Internet connection, in most cases having an online presence expands one's reach only insignificantly without recourse to other (and in many cases much more timetested) means of generating participation. This phenomenon has been amply demonstrated by quantitative researchers: for example, Goel, Watts and colleagues find that less than 3% of individual communications on the Internet spread to more than four people, and mass media is still overwhelmingly responsible for the diffusion of what we think of as "viral" content on the Internet [37,38].…”

The Challenges of Democratizing News and Information: Examining Data on Social Media, Viral Patterns and Digital Influence

“…Truly viral events, featuring large swells of "bottom up" peer-to-peer sharing by crowds, are exceedingly rare; they occur at a rate of perhaps one in a million across content shared online, including news. 24 Nahon, co-author with Jeff Hemsley of the 2013 book Going Viral, notes that within social media channels the overwhelming majority of viral items are derivatives or copies of, or responses to, content generated by mass-media producers. Numerous research studies support this.…”

“…However, truly viral events, defined by many multiple generations of sharing and a reach of several thousand adoptions at least, occurred on the order of about one in a million links shared. 119 "These are very, very rare events," Goel, the lead author, says. "Almost always people are getting information directly from popular sources and they don't pass it along."…”