1933
DOI: 10.1152/physrev.1933.13.3.301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Structural Changes in Striped Muscle During Contraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

1934
1934
1983
1983

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With contraction, striated muscle changes its shape but maintains its volume almost perfectly. Consistent with this fact, the sarcomere of a myofibril thickens as it shortens (1), and also appears to maintain a constant volume. The striation changes which accompany changes in sarcomere length have been fitted to a sliding-filament model (2,3) which has formed the basis for a hypothesis on the mechanism of muscle contraction (4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…With contraction, striated muscle changes its shape but maintains its volume almost perfectly. Consistent with this fact, the sarcomere of a myofibril thickens as it shortens (1), and also appears to maintain a constant volume. The striation changes which accompany changes in sarcomere length have been fitted to a sliding-filament model (2,3) which has formed the basis for a hypothesis on the mechanism of muscle contraction (4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…It is this aspect of the question to which most of our results are relevant, but the experiments were originally planned in the hope of deciding a different point, namely, whether contraction bands are formed, and, if so, under what conditions. The formation of contraction bands, and the consequent reversal of striations, was seen by many observers during the second half of the 19th century (see review by Heidenhain, 1899); this was confirmed by some more recent workers (Jordan, 1933;Speidel, 1939), but denied by others (Hiirthle, 1909;Buchthal et al 1936). Even if the reality of these contraction bands was admitted on this evidence, there remained the question whether their formation was an accompaniment of 'activation', of tension development or of shortening; this distinction could not be made on the existing evidence, since only slow contractions, with more or less unlimited shortening, had been studied.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Their explanation for this finding was that sarcomere lengths were not constant throughout the length of the muscle. These authors referred to the work of Jordon (1933) and Brandt et al (1967) who demonstrated that short sarcomeres, representing some degree of contraction, are thicker than the longer sarcomeres in the same fiber, and since the muscle was not rigidly constrained during freezing, it was possible that small focal or localized contractions may have occurred at various locations along the fiber. Consequently, if variations in sarcomere length within a fiber were random, it would not be expected that the diameter of adjacent fibers would alter in unison.…”
Section: Between Procedures (mentioning
confidence: 99%