2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.2012.01161.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The structural basis of αβ T‐lineage immune recognition: TCR docking topologies, mechanotransduction, and co‐receptor function

Abstract: Summary Self versus non-self discrimination is at the core of T lymphocyte recognition. To this end, αβ T-cell receptors (TCRs) ligate ‘foreign’ peptides bound to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I or class II molecules (pMHC) arrayed on the surface of antigen-presenting cells (APCs). Since the discovery of TCRs ~30 years ago, considerable structural and functional data have detailed the molecular basis of their extraordinary ligand specificity and sensitivity in mediating adaptive T-cell immunity.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
104
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 127 publications
(211 reference statements)
3
104
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3E). Bond lifetime modification by force is not unexpected (18,19,30) and is not correlated with force-free 3D (31-33) or 2D measurements (28,34). Thus, prolonged bond lifetime for M2 3 under force compared with M2 2 is not inconsistent with the solution NMR analyses, where binding is force-free and occurs in the absence of biomembrane constraints.…”
Section: Pretcrβ Subunit Displays Structural Elements With Potential Formentioning
confidence: 84%
“…3E). Bond lifetime modification by force is not unexpected (18,19,30) and is not correlated with force-free 3D (31-33) or 2D measurements (28,34). Thus, prolonged bond lifetime for M2 3 under force compared with M2 2 is not inconsistent with the solution NMR analyses, where binding is force-free and occurs in the absence of biomembrane constraints.…”
Section: Pretcrβ Subunit Displays Structural Elements With Potential Formentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Our data provide a structural framework that can potentially begin to reconcile disparate observations about how the TCR relays a ligation event to signaling. Such observations include studies showing that monomeric pMHC possesses little to no ability to induce signaling regardless of affinity (49), there exist signaling-permissive and -nonpermissive pMHC-TCR docking geometries (48), conformational changes occur in the TCR upon pMHC ligation (46,(50)(51)(52), the CD4 and CD8 coreceptors are required to place Lck relative to the CD3 ITAMs (53, 54), phosphatases are occluded from the T-cell Ag-presenting cell synapse (18,26,55), and mechanotransduction appears to be important for TCR signaling (19,36,(56)(57)(58)(59) (Fig. 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What, if any, role interactions between TCR and CD3 ECDs play in the assembly and function of the complex remains controversial (5): there are several plausible proposed models of activation, which are not necessarily mutually exclusive (5,(17)(18)(19). Although structures of TCR-peptide-MHC (pMHC) complexes (2), TCR-MHC-I-like complexes (1), and the CD3 dimers (6-10) have been separately determined, how the αβ TCR associates with the CD3 complex is largely unknown.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the DN3 stage, a pre-TCR complex is generated comprised of a variable TCR␤ chain disulfide-linked to the invariant pT␣ subunit. In turn, the pT␣-␤ heterodimer is noncovalently complexed with the same CD3 dimers as found in the ␣␤TCR, namely CD3⑀␥, CD3⑀␦, and CD3 (1,2). This pre-TCR complex triggers cellular survival and expansion and, importantly, induces expression of CD4 and CD8 co-receptors so that the thymocytes transit to the DP (CD4 ϩ CD8 ϩ ) thymocyte stage where rearrangement of the TCR␣ gene occurs.…”
Section: And References Therein)mentioning
confidence: 99%