2010
DOI: 10.1524/zkri.2010.1216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The strong phase object approximation may allow extending crystallographic phases of dynamical electron diffraction patterns of 3D protein nano-crystals

Abstract: Abstract. Simulations suggest that the strong phase object approximation of dynamical scattering may allow extracting crystallographic phase information from single 2D electron diffraction patterns of 3D protein crystals using probabilitistic procedures. Unlike other phasing methods, the procedure does not require any additional knowledgelike real space images, atomicity, non-crystallographic symmetry, the presence or location of disordered solvent or the availability of a support with a known structure. In sp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By allowing significant phase fluctuations with arbitrary κ|ψ|, (3) and ( 4) is an improvement over the weak-phase-object approximation e iκψ ≈ 1 + iκψ (5) often used in cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) [1,34,41]. Following the nomenclature in [41,89], we call (3) and (4) the strong-phase-object approximation, noting, however, that f is a complex-valued function in general (thus e iκψ not a 'phase' object per se).…”
Section: Forward Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By allowing significant phase fluctuations with arbitrary κ|ψ|, (3) and ( 4) is an improvement over the weak-phase-object approximation e iκψ ≈ 1 + iκψ (5) often used in cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) [1,34,41]. Following the nomenclature in [41,89], we call (3) and (4) the strong-phase-object approximation, noting, however, that f is a complex-valued function in general (thus e iκψ not a 'phase' object per se).…”
Section: Forward Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it turned out, the individual diffraction patterns provided a challenge as the relative orientation of the crystal lattice for each pattern was unknown, so merging diffraction data from multiple crystals was difficult. Data processing methods were then developed (Jiang et al, 2009) (Abrahams, 2010), before improved detectors yielded better signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) (Nederlof et al, 2011). Reducing electron dosage (to 0.1 e − Å −2 s −1 ) prevented degradation and acquired more diffraction patterns per crystal (Nederlof et al, 2013), allowing patterns to be orientated.…”
Section: Electron Crystallographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the indices and their corresponding intensity are known, methods from X-ray crystallography can be used to reconstruct the 3D lattice of intensities in reciprocal space. Phase recovery of electron diffraction (Abrahams, 2010) may be facilitated by dynamical scattering effects but requires knowledge of the orientation parameters for each recorded intensity, which means that standard X-ray crystallography data integration software may not be used for this purpose. Subsequent iterative refinement is essential for determining the atomic structure and may involve correction for dynamical scattering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%