1998
DOI: 10.1080/026999498377999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Stress of Organisational Change: A Dynamic Process Model

Abstract: Plongees dans un marche mondial, les organisations ne cessent de subir de profonds changements. Encore que la plupart de ces changements soient necessaires et souvent retard&, ils presentent comme inconvenient le risque de cofits eleves en ternie d'accroissement des depenses de sante, de pertes de productivite, de baisse de la satisfaction professionnelle et de chute du moral. Ces coDts peuvent &tre directement imputes a la dktresse qui frappe les salaries d'une organisation confrontee a des changement permane… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
46
0
6

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(6 reference statements)
2
46
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In accordance with research in other areas of organizational transitions (e.g. Mack et al, 1998), we expected that the experience of reassignment decreases well-being. However, we found no effect for reassignment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In accordance with research in other areas of organizational transitions (e.g. Mack et al, 1998), we expected that the experience of reassignment decreases well-being. However, we found no effect for reassignment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Mack et al, 1998), we expect the same for reassignment. This is why we propose an interaction effect of reassignment and commitment on well-being.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…For example, flexibility and fluidity becomes a new regulator for organizations to instill in their managers and employees, which in turn results in a heightened sense of insecurity. Even employees who are able to hold on to their jobs, still view their employment as unstable and fear the future (Mack, Nelson, & Quick, 1998). Although the classical change model of unfreezing-moving-refreezing remains a way to deal with today's constantly changing environment, as one employee recently observed, the constancy of change has resulted in a state of "slush: never refrozen, always in an uncertain state" (Mack, et al, 1998: 220).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Afin de mieux comprendre comment les changements organisationnels majeurs affectent les travailleurs, ne faudrait-il pas également tenir compte de la signification attribuée par les travailleurs à ces changements ? La signification accordée aux événements de l'environnement auquel un individu est confronté est au coeur du modèle transactionnel du stress défini initialement par Lazarus et Folkman (1984) (voir aussi Mackay & Cooper, 1987) et généralisé par la suite aux études sur les changements organisationnels par Mack, Nelson et Quick (1998). Trois éléments sousjacents caractérisent ce type de modèle.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified