The stress appraisal measure (SAM): A multidimensional approach to cognitive appraisal

Abstract

Cognitive‐relational theory emphasizes the fundamental role of cognitive appraisal in the stress process. However, existing measures of stress appraisal suffer from conceptual and methodological problems. The present paper reports the development of a new stress appraisal scale that attempts to overcome some of these difficulties. Six dimensions of primary and secondary appraisal were identified: threat, challenge, centrality, controllable‐by‐self, controllable‐by‐others, uncontrollable‐by‐anyone. Items were generated for each of these dimensions, as well as for an overall perceived stressfulness scale. In three studies examining anticipatory stress experienced by undergraduates, these items were subjected to item‐selection, analysis and validation procedures. The findings provide strong support for the psychometric properties of the scales. Two factor analyses showed that the six appraisal dimensions were relatively independent. In multiple regression analyses, threat and centrality consistently emerged as significant predictors of overall stressfulness. The Stress Appraisal Measure (SAM) appears to be a promising instrument for use in future stress research.

Low Burnout and High Engagement Levels in Athletic Trainers: Results of a Nationwide Random Sample

“…The stressfulness subscale of the Stress Appraisal Measure (SAM) 20 consists of 4 items that measure total stressfulness (eg, Does this situation tax or exceed my coping resources? ) that results from a specific situation.…”

Knowledge Exchange in Intra-Organizational Innovation Communities: The Role of Cognitive and Affective States

“…Second, Wood and Bandura (1989) found in their studies on complex organizational decision making that threatening situations create high levels of stress and feelings of loss of control. Threatening situations may stem from multiple sources such as a recession at the macro level or mobbing at the micro level to name only two (e.g., Peacock and Wong 1990;Leymann 1996). According to Wood and Bandura (1989), self-efficacy reduces these feelings in threatening situations as individuals remain focused on finding solutions and do not get overwhelmed by anxious feelings.…”

Managing Emotional Requirements in a Context-Aware Mobile Application for Tourists

“…In such measures, users are asked how they currently feel (e.g., nervous, scared, inspired). Other methods, like the Stress Appraisal Measure [37] , measure the user's stress level. Finally, with the help of experience sampling methods [38], it may be possible to capture people's emotions.…”