1946
DOI: 10.1299/jsmemag.49.334_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Strength of Metals under Combined Alternating Bending and Torsion with Phase Difference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
69
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have finally checked the effectiveness of our model in fitting experimental results and in predicting failure. To this end, we use some of the experimental data which can be found in the literature (see [8,11,12,18,20]). In each case, we have used the data coming from simple tension compression tests (called training points in the sequel) to fit the parameters of the model and to make predictions for the other observations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have finally checked the effectiveness of our model in fitting experimental results and in predicting failure. To this end, we use some of the experimental data which can be found in the literature (see [8,11,12,18,20]). In each case, we have used the data coming from simple tension compression tests (called training points in the sequel) to fit the parameters of the model and to make predictions for the other observations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 7: Experimental fatigue data of 30NCD16 (f -1 = 690MPa, t -1 = 428MPa, f 0 = 1090MPa), from Froustey and Lasserr (1989). Table 8: Experimental fatigue data of "Acier doux" (f -1 = 235MPa, t -1 = 137MPa, f 0 = 342MPa), from Nishihara and Kawamoto (1945). Table 9: Experimental fatigue data of 34Cr4 (f -1 = 415MPa, t -1 = 259MPa, f0= 648MPa), from Heidenreich and Zenner (1979 The analysis of results obtained on the comparison between the experimental fatigue limit and the calculated ones obtained from Crossland and Sines fatigue criteria as presented in Figure 1 and Figure 2 showed clearly their poor predictions capacity for stress states presenting mobile principal stress directions; with majority of the error index out of an error interval of 10%.…”
Section: Fatigue Methods Of Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An experimental dataset in bending-torsion provided from the literature [23,26,30] is used in this section in order to confront inquadrature results with the behavior predicted by the Liu & Mahadevan's criterion. Experimental dots lying above or on the curves correspond to conservative tests (D P 1) while dots lying below correspond to non-conservative tests (D < 1).…”
Section: Application and Confrontation With Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%