1986
DOI: 10.1017/s0079497x00006721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Stratigraphy of Kirkhead Cave, an Upper Palaeolithic Site in Northern England: a comment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1990
1990
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Volume 5 2 of the Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society contained two articles (Salisbury 1986;Tipping 1986) critical of our paper 'The stratigraphy of Kirkhead Cave, an upper palaeolithic site in northern England' (Gale and Hunt 1985). Here we reply.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Volume 5 2 of the Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society contained two articles (Salisbury 1986;Tipping 1986) critical of our paper 'The stratigraphy of Kirkhead Cave, an upper palaeolithic site in northern England' (Gale and Hunt 1985). Here we reply.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…As a last point, if the deposits had been as disturbed as Salisbury (1986, 323) suggests, then it would have been astonishing for the mean magnetic declination of the beds to be confined within the rangẽ 32o-36o° and their mean magnetic inclination to be confined within the range ~5O-8o°. RESPONSE TO COMMENTS BY TIPPING (1986) We deal with the criticisms made of our work by Tipping (1986) in the order in which they appear in his text. 5.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%