The Strategy of Third-Party Mediation Based on the Option Prioritization in the Graph Model

Wu, Zhenggao; Xu, Haiyan; Ke, Ginger Y.

doi:10.1007/s11518-019-5419-7

Cited by 15 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As a diversified field of literature, third party interventions can be categorized based on the options of strategies that can be encountered (Anugrah, Putra, & Burhanuddin, 2020;Prein, 1987;B A Putra, 2020), forms of contribution contextualized (Y.-M. Chang, Sanders, & Walia, 2010;Darwis, Putra, & Cangara, 2020;Putra, 2020Putra, , 2021, and an outline of models of intervention (Lewicki, Weiss, & Lewin, 1992). More specifically on this subject, several studies has attempted to quantify the options of prioritization for intervention structures and models (Wu, Xu, & Ke, 2019) (Belliveau & Stolte, 1977), which is all critical in understanding why some third party interventions are not in the same form of others. Specifically, in the discourse of third party interventions in conflicts, a growing literature can be found on the 3 rd party's role in symmetrical conflicts (Balch-Lindsay, Enterline, & Joyce, n.d.), divided only by the specifics of the intervention speed (Conlon & Fasolo, 1990) and timing (Y. M. Chang, Luo, & Zhang, 2018).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hindrances to Third-Party Interventions in Conflict Resolution: United Nations and Patterns of Constraints in Resolving the Lord’s Resistance Army Conflict Between 2008-2012

Putra

2021

Acad. J. Interdiscip. Stud.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since 1987, the Lord’s Resistance Army has continued systematic human rights violations in the Central African region. Cases of kidnapping, village raids, mass rapes, and murders, have become defining factors to the urgency of resolving the crisis. In an attempt to respond to the conflict, the United Nations Security Council has initiated a number of political and military-based resolutions to control the conflict since 2008, which includes extending UN peacekeeping mandates in Uganda, Democratic Republic of Congo, and South Sudan, as well as coordinate efforts with relevant African Union bodies. However, its success is far-reached, urging the need to contextualize the forms of hindrances that the UN faced in responding to the crisis. Employing Rourke and Bouyer’s (1996) concept of collective security and measures of response success, with a research limitation set to 2008-2012, a qualitative research utilizing secondary data is implemented, concluding the following hindrances that can be categorized into the following; (1) Implementation of the additional mandate of the UN Peace Forces, (2) Application of the AU Regional Task Force, and (3) Implementation of the Disarmament, Demobilization, Repatriation, Resettlement, and Reintegration program. Received: 16 December 2020 / Accepted: 11 March 2021 / Published: 10 May 2021

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hindrances to Third-Party Interventions in Conflict Resolution: United Nations and Patterns of Constraints in Resolving the Lord’s Resistance Army Conflict Between 2008-2012

Putra

2021

Acad. J. Interdiscip. Stud.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Further, the third party can realize trust risk management and optimize CEP by influencing the DMs' preferences. Based on the above analysis and inspired by the work by Wu, et al [13], the third-party regulatory agency should comply with the following hypotheses: Hypothesis 1. The third party is fair, impartial, reliable, and not driven by various interests in CEP.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Trust Risk Dynamic Management Mechanism Based on Third-Party Monitoring for the Conflict-Eliminating Process of Social Network Group Decision Making

Liu

et al. 2023

IEEE Trans. Cybern.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Every decision may involve risks. Real-world risk issues are usually supervised by third parties. Decision-making may be affected by the absence of sufficient or reasonable trust or to the opposite, an unconditional, excessive, or blind trust, which is called trust risks. Conflict eliminating process (CEP) aims to facilitate satisfactory consensus by decision makers (DMs) through continuous reconciliation between their opinion differences on the subject matter. This paper addresses trust risks in CEP of social network group decision making (SNGDM) through third-party monitoring. A trust risk analysis-based conflict-eliminating model for SNGDM is developed. It is assumed that a third-party agency monitors the DMs' credibility and performance, which is recorded in an objective evaluation matrix and multi-attribute trust assessment matrix (MTAM). A trust risk measurement methodology is proposed to classify the DMs' different trust risk types and to measure the trust risk index (TRI) of a group of DMs. When TRI is unacceptable, a trust risk management mechanism that controls TRI is activated. Different management policies are applicable to DMs' different trust risk types. There are two main methods: 1) dynamically update the MTAM based on DMs' performance, and 2) provide suggestions for modifying the DM's information with high TRI. Besides, as part of the integrated CEP, this model includes an optimization approach to dynamically derive DMs' reliable aggregation weights from their MTAM. Simulation experiments and an illustrative example support the feasibility and validity of the proposed model for managing trust risks in CEP of SNGDM.

show abstract

The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution: Reflections on Three Decades of Development

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Strategy of Third-Party Mediation Based on the Option Prioritization in the Graph Model

Cited by 15 publications

References 26 publications

Hindrances to Third-Party Interventions in Conflict Resolution: United Nations and Patterns of Constraints in Resolving the Lord’s Resistance Army Conflict Between 2008-2012

Hindrances to Third-Party Interventions in Conflict Resolution: United Nations and Patterns of Constraints in Resolving the Lord’s Resistance Army Conflict Between 2008-2012

A Trust Risk Dynamic Management Mechanism Based on Third-Party Monitoring for the Conflict-Eliminating Process of Social Network Group Decision Making

The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution: Reflections on Three Decades of Development

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About