2014
DOI: 10.1017/s0022109014000350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Strategic Listing Decisions of Hedge Funds

Abstract: The voluntary nature of hedge fund database reporting creates strategic listing opportunities for hedge funds. However, little is known about how managers list funds across multiple databases or whether investors are fooled by funds’ listing decisions. In this paper, we find that hedge funds strategically list their small, best-performing funds in multiple outlets immediately while preserving the option to list their other funds in additional databases later. We generally find that investors react rationally t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note important data limitations associated with commercial hedge fund return series which we do our best to address. As has been noted in prior research, funds retain discretion on reporting their returns (see: Bollen and Pool (2008), Bollen and Pool (2009), Jorion andSchwarz (2014), andPatton, Ramadorai, andStreatfield (2015)). We restrict our sample to funds for which we have at least 24 months of data, excluding the first 24 months of data to avoid incubation bias, and we also require funds to have at least $20 million in gross asset value.…”
Section: Iiie Inside Investment and Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note important data limitations associated with commercial hedge fund return series which we do our best to address. As has been noted in prior research, funds retain discretion on reporting their returns (see: Bollen and Pool (2008), Bollen and Pool (2009), Jorion andSchwarz (2014), andPatton, Ramadorai, andStreatfield (2015)). We restrict our sample to funds for which we have at least 24 months of data, excluding the first 24 months of data to avoid incubation bias, and we also require funds to have at least $20 million in gross asset value.…”
Section: Iiie Inside Investment and Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such hedge funds may stop reporting performance to databases because they no longer have incentives to advertise themselves among investors (Ackermann et al, 1999). Jorion & Schwarz (2014) indeed find that investment companies act strategically and they list in multiple commercial databases their small, best-performing funds, which helps them raise awareness about the funds and attract new investments (Fung & Hsieh, 1997, 2000. Agarwal et al (2013) examine the impact of self-selection bias by comparing data in five commercial databases with information in Form 13F that are reported quarterly by advisors (rather than funds) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).…”
Section: Empirical Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the majority do self-report to one or more of the commercial hedge fund databases available, many do not, making it difficult to measure overall industry performance and managerial skill. Also, because voluntary reporting is often done for marketing purposes, this leads to positive selection bias in commercial database coverage (e.g., Aiken et al, 2013;Jorion & Schwarz, 2014) resulting in a serious overstating of average hedge fund returns (Getmansky et al, 2015). In addition, there is a high attrition rate among hedge funds reporting to commercial databases (Getmansky et al, 2015).…”
Section: Hedge Fundsmentioning
confidence: 99%