2003
DOI: 10.1080/1367626032000068154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Straightedge Youth Sub-Culture: Observations on the Complexity of Sub-Cultural Identity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, other research shows heterogeneous communities tend to fragment and enter a state of decline (Hebdige 1979;Irwin 1973;Logan 2004;Spiegler 1996;Wood 2003). Consider, for example, the disco dance movement.…”
Section: Heterogeneity and Community Continuitymentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In contrast, other research shows heterogeneous communities tend to fragment and enter a state of decline (Hebdige 1979;Irwin 1973;Logan 2004;Spiegler 1996;Wood 2003). Consider, for example, the disco dance movement.…”
Section: Heterogeneity and Community Continuitymentioning
confidence: 82%
“…For example, within the North American 'straightedge' youth subculture, the 'masculine' characteristics of rationality and control are favoured, while the 'masculine' behaviours of drinking, smoking, drug use, and promiscuous sex are denied and avoided (Wood, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But these boundaries are not rigid. Indeed, the online forum serves as a meeting space for people who have had very different experiences with straightedge, depending on their biographies and the conditions under which they come to affiliate with the subculture (Lahickey 1998; Wood 2003). As previously mentioned, many participants claim to be members of face‐to‐face straightedge music scenes, whereas others admit they do not.…”
Section: Expressing Authentic Identities Onlinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result was static and homogeneous conceptualizations of the subcultures in question (see Fine and Kleinman 1979). In contrast, symbolic interactionists emphasize that each participant's perspective on the subculture is unique—an insight that enables the more nuanced understanding that subcultural members “will not internalize or identify with pre‐existing culture in exactly the same way, nor will they necessarily construct identical or even similar subcultural identities” (Wood 2003:38).…”
Section: Expressing Authentic Identities Onlinementioning
confidence: 99%