2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00021-019-0464-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Stokes Limit in a Three-Dimensional Chemotaxis-Navier–Stokes System

Abstract: We consider initial-boundary value problems for the κ-dependent family of chemotaxis-(Navier-)Stokes systemsin a bounded domain Ω ⊂ R 3 with smooth boundary and given potential function φ ∈ C 1+β Ω for some β > 0. It is known that for fixed κ ∈ R an associated initial-boundary value problem possesses at least one global weak solution (n (κ) , c (κ) , u (κ) ), which after some waiting time becomes a classical solution of the system. In this work we will show that upon letting κ → 0 the solutions (n (κ) , c (κ) … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reasoning along these lines has previously been utilized in similar settings and can e.g. be found in [41,Lemma 7.13], [20,Lemma 3.12] and [6,Lemma 7.5].…”
Section: Proof: Straightforward Calculations Utilizing Integration Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reasoning along these lines has previously been utilized in similar settings and can e.g. be found in [41,Lemma 7.13], [20,Lemma 3.12] and [6,Lemma 7.5].…”
Section: Proof: Straightforward Calculations Utilizing Integration Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, to derive (6.9) we observe that since the inequality n ≥ 3 warrants that 1 + (n+1)(n−2) 3n+2 = n(n+2) 3n+2 ≥ 4 3 , and since W 1, n(n+2) 3n+2 (Ω) ֒→ L n+2 2 (Ω) due to the fact that 1− 3n+2 n+2 = − 2n n+2 , with some c 2 > 0 we have ∇ψ…”
Section: Energy Analysismentioning
confidence: 91%
“…as documented for the Neumann problem for (1.1) in [26, (3.1)]. Replacing homogeneous Neumann by inhomogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions for v, in the derivation of (1.2) additional boundary integrals arise, destroying the (quasi-)Lyapunov structure of (1.2) or relatives thereof on which existence results in, e.g., [18], [27], [35], [4], [40], [26], [33] or also [15] essentially relied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent paper, Wang et al 33 proved the solutions ( n κ , c κ , u κ ) of the chemotaxis‐Navier‐Stokes system () with χ ( n , c ) ≡ 1 stabilize to the solution ( n 0 , c 0 , u 0 ) of the corresponding chemotaxis‐Stokes system uniformly with respect to the time as κ → 0, which corresponds to Re → 0 ( Re=κζ is the Reynolds number ) due to the constant viscosity ζ of the fluid. The more recent paper 34 investigated the three‐dimensional version of this problem. Later, Wu‐Xiang 35 proved the solutions ( n κ , c κ , u κ ) of the chemotaxis‐Navier‐Stokes system () stabilize to the solution ( n 0 , c 0 , u 0 ) of the corresponding chemotaxis‐Stokes system uniformly with respect to the time as κ → 0.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%