2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.mulfin.2016.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The stock preferences of domestic versus foreign investors: Evidence from Qualified Foreign Institutional Investors (QFIIs) in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there are previous studies that focus on the investment preferences of foreign mutual funds (e.g., Covrig, Lau, and Ng 2006;Zou, Tang and Li 2016), the majority of previous studies on foreign institutional ownership consider foreign investors as a homogenous group (see, e.g., Kang and Stulz 1997;Dahlquist and Robertsson 2001;Min and Bowman 2015). The comparison of portfolio holding decisions of foreign funds and foreign corporate investors is often neglected.…”
Section: Foreign Funds Vs Foreign Corporationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although there are previous studies that focus on the investment preferences of foreign mutual funds (e.g., Covrig, Lau, and Ng 2006;Zou, Tang and Li 2016), the majority of previous studies on foreign institutional ownership consider foreign investors as a homogenous group (see, e.g., Kang and Stulz 1997;Dahlquist and Robertsson 2001;Min and Bowman 2015). The comparison of portfolio holding decisions of foreign funds and foreign corporate investors is often neglected.…”
Section: Foreign Funds Vs Foreign Corporationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies on the determinants of foreign equity ownership either considers foreign investors as a homogenous group (Kang and Stulz 1997;Dahlquist and Robertsson 2001;Min and Bowman 2015) or focuses only on the preferences of foreign mutual funds (Covrig, Lau, and Ng 2006;Zou, Tang and Li 2016). In this study, we explicitly distinguish between the ownership choices of foreign funds and foreign corporations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Study conducted by Huang (2007) showed an increase in persistence of volatility after the QFII scheme's implementation in both mutual fund and A-share markets. Wang & Han (2008) found return volatility of the Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share indices were lower than those of the corresponding B-share indices during -2005. Zou et al (2016 used unique data spanning from 2003 through 2014 to examine the preferences of domestic and foreign institutional holdings in China; empirical findings showed similar preferences of both institutions on certain stock characteristics, but difference towards industry allocations.…”
Section: Market Liberalization In Chinamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Industry characteristics may also effect the stock preferences of the investors. Zou et al (2016) study the stock preferences of domestic and foreign investors and exhibit that foreign institutional investors prefer to invest in sectors such as financial, transportation, professional services, and technology in Chinese capital markets. This paper gives insights about firm and industry level perspectives since the effects of institutional investors can be observed both in capital markets and directly the growth of the firm and hence the growth of industry incorporating in the economy (Railo, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%