2005
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.724024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Stock Market and Capital Accumulation: An Application to UK Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The paper of Eliades and Weeken (2004) applies Hall's methodology to the U.K. These authors find no trace of intangible capital for the U.K. before 1990 but reach the same qualitative results as Hall (2001) for the late 90s.…”
Section: Relationship To Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The paper of Eliades and Weeken (2004) applies Hall's methodology to the U.K. These authors find no trace of intangible capital for the U.K. before 1990 but reach the same qualitative results as Hall (2001) for the late 90s.…”
Section: Relationship To Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 84%
“…For the sake of comparison, the same parameters as those in Hall (2001) are used. These are also used by Eliades and Weeken (2004). Section 6 analyzes the impact of specifying different ranges of parameters on the implied stock of capital k t and further discusses the rationale for the choice of certain parameter values.…”
Section: Empirical Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, one anomaly in Hall's findings is that the quantity of intangibles falls below zero for a decade, starting in the mid-70s. Eliades and Weeken (2004) apply Hall's methodology to the U.K. These authors also find negative intangibles throughout the 70s, the 80s and early 90s.…”
Section: Difference With Other Approachesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…7 Fuller data descriptions and sources are given in the Appendix (data are available on request). 8 For a discussion of the US context, seeNakamura (2001) andLev (2003).9 The discussion here is drawn fromEliades and Weeken (2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%