1988
DOI: 10.2307/2008591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Stieltjes Function--Definition and Properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We get, in less than 7 s of time and with a precision of at least 40 digits, the results in Table 6; to be sure about the correctness of such results we computed them twice using the formulae (31)-(32) and then we compared the outcomes. These values are in agreement with the data on p. 282 of Bohman-Fröberg [3] for n = 0, . .…”
Section: The General Casesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We get, in less than 7 s of time and with a precision of at least 40 digits, the results in Table 6; to be sure about the correctness of such results we computed them twice using the formulae (31)-(32) and then we compared the outcomes. These values are in agreement with the data on p. 282 of Bohman-Fröberg [3] for n = 0, . .…”
Section: The General Casesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…There are infinitely many γ n of each sign 27 In Letter 71 Stieltjes uses the notation C0, C1, ..., but in Letter 75 he uses the same notation with a different meaning. We substitute A0, A1, ... for the Letter 71 coefficients following [36]. 28 The result (3.2.2) is misstated in Erdëlyi et al [87, (1.12.17)], making the right side equal (−1) n n!…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Throughout this paper when several "±" or "∓" are encountered in the same formula, it signifies that either the upper signs are used everywhere or the lower signs are used everywhere (but not the mix of them). 8 Note that since many formulas with the kernels decaying exponentially fast were already obtained in the past by Legendre, Poisson, Binet, Malmsten, Jensen, Hermite, Lindelöf and many others (see e.g. a formula for the digamma function on p. 541 [5], or [4] or [22]), it is possible that formulas similar or equivalent to those we derive in this section might appear in earlier sources of which we are not aware.…”
Section: Integral Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liang and Todd proposed computing γ n either via the Euler-Maclaurin summation formula for ζ(s), or, as an alternative, via the application of Euler's series transformation to the alternating zeta function. Bohman and Fröberg [8] later refined the limit formula technique. Formula (3) is a differentiated form of Hermite's integral representation for ζ(s, v), which can be interpreted as the Abel-Plana summation formula applied to the series for ζ(s, v).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%