2005
DOI: 10.1086/428044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Stellar Mass Function of Galaxies to z  ~ 5 in the FORS Deep and GOODS-South Fields

Abstract: We present a measurement of the evolution of the stellar mass function (MF) of galaxies and the evolution of the total stellar mass density at 0 < z < 5, extending previous measurements to higher redshift and fainter magnitudes (and lower masses). We use deep multicolor data in the Fors Deep Field (FDF; I-selected reaching I AB ∼ 26.8) and the GOODS-S/CDFS region (K-selected reaching K AB ∼ 25.4) to estimate stellar masses based on fits to composite stellar population models for 5557 and 3367 sources, respecti… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

44
337
8

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 228 publications
(389 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
44
337
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of GALFORM have been compared to previous observational data by Bower et al who show good fits to the observed mass functions of Glazebrook et al (2004), Fontana et al (2004) and Drory et al (2005). However we note that the WIRDS results provide a much stronger constraint on the mass function over the 1 < z < 2 redshift range than these previous results.…”
Section: Comparison To Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…The results of GALFORM have been compared to previous observational data by Bower et al who show good fits to the observed mass functions of Glazebrook et al (2004), Fontana et al (2004) and Drory et al (2005). However we note that the WIRDS results provide a much stronger constraint on the mass function over the 1 < z < 2 redshift range than these previous results.…”
Section: Comparison To Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Studies focused on field galaxies (Drory et al 2005;Gwyn & Hartwick 2005;Fontana et al 2006;Bundy et al 2006;Pozzetti et al 2007;Drory et al 2009;Baldry et al 2012), present the mass function for the global field galaxy population at different redshifts and obtain consistent results. Fontana et al (2004Fontana et al ( , 2006; Bundy et al (2006); Borch et al (2006); demonstrated that galaxies with M * ≥ 10 11 M exhibit relatively modest evolution in their total mass function from z = 1 to z = 0.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The stronger increase in the number density of low/intermediate-mass passive galaxies with respect to massive and passive galaxies is a clear indication of mass-assembly "downsizing" (Fontana et al 2004;Drory et al 2005;Bundy et al 2006;Cimatti et al 2006;Thomas et al 2010;Pozzetti et al 2010;Moresco et al 2010), with more massive galaxies having assembled their mass at higher redshifts and already being in place at z ∼ 1. The result of this analysis is in agreement with many other works: Scarlata et al (2007b) studying ETGs in the COSMOS field found no traces of significant evolution in the number density of bright (∼L > 2.5L * ) ETGs, with a maximum increase of ∼30% from z ∼ 0.7 to z ∼ 0 when allowing for different SFHs and cosmic variance; Pozzetti et al (2010) found an almost negligible evolution in the number density of quiescent galaxies in zCOSMOS-10k sample, <0.1 dex between z = 0.85 and z = 0.25 for log (M/M ) > 11−11.5; from the analysis of the UltraVISTA-DR1 sample Ilbert et al (2013) found that massive galaxies (log (M/M ) > 11.2) do not show any significant evolution between 0.8 < z < 1.1 and 0.2 < z < 0.5, while low-mass ones (log (M/M ) ∼ 9.5) increase in number density by a factor >5.…”
Section: Number Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%