1985
DOI: 10.1029/jb090ib12p10417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Steens Mountain (Oregon) geomagnetic polarity transition: 2. Field intensity variations and discussion of reversal models

Abstract: We carried out an extensive paleointensity study of the 15.5±0.3 m.y. Miocene reversed‐to‐normal polarity transition recorded in lava flows from Steens Mountain (south central Oregon). One hundred eighty‐five samples from the collection whose paleodirectional study is reported by Mankinen et al. (this issue) were chosen for paleointensity investigations because of their low viscosity index, high Curie point and reversibility, or near reversibility, of the strong field magnetization curve versus temperature. Ap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

15
150
0
5

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 320 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
(151 reference statements)
15
150
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…We interpret this as an indication of slower recovery of paleointensity after a transition. This is in contrast to the Steens Mountain polarity transition in which both direction and intensity changed almost simultaneously (Prevot et al, 1985). In the case of section RK, it is difficult to estimate the exact time span the lava sequence covers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…We interpret this as an indication of slower recovery of paleointensity after a transition. This is in contrast to the Steens Mountain polarity transition in which both direction and intensity changed almost simultaneously (Prevot et al, 1985). In the case of section RK, it is difficult to estimate the exact time span the lava sequence covers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The applied criteria for the acceptance or rejection of the results are those described by Chauvin et al (2000) and Gómez-Paccard et al (2006). The mean archaeointensity for each site was determined using the weighting factor described by Prévot et al (1985) and the corresponding uncertainty about the mean is expressed by the standard deviation of the unweighted average (Table 2). Goff and Kondopoulou).…”
Section: Archaeointensitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thellier [32] suggests that the baked earth is the most suitable material for paleointensity determinations. A unique advantage of the Thellier method is that, as the heating temperature is progressively increased, magnetomineralogical alteration can be detected directly during the experiment using standard partial thermoremanent magnetisation (pTRM) checks [33]. The Arai plot has been drawn with the measured NRM and TRM magnetisation values.…”
Section: Paleointensity Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%