2009
DOI: 10.1007/s12664-009-0076-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The steatocrit as a measure of fecal fat excretion: uses and pitfalls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower rate of detection of EPI by the acid steatocrit test could possibly be attributed to the disadvantages this method. These include a lack of standardisation of the test and the effect of dietary fat intake at the time of sample collection on the test results[ 15 , 22 ]. The number of patients in M-ANNHEIM stages 0 and III were smaller and a higher number would have enhanced the quality of this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower rate of detection of EPI by the acid steatocrit test could possibly be attributed to the disadvantages this method. These include a lack of standardisation of the test and the effect of dietary fat intake at the time of sample collection on the test results[ 15 , 22 ]. The number of patients in M-ANNHEIM stages 0 and III were smaller and a higher number would have enhanced the quality of this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantification of unabsorbed fats and oils in fecal matter is essential to develop lipase inhibitors and malabsorption drugs. 1 The amount of excreted fat has been measured in various ways in the clinic to diagnose pancreatic diseases and intestinal disorders, as well as in animal studies. 1,2 One method involves titration of the extracted fatty acid; 3 however, this chemical analysis is complicated and time-consuming, and may require the use of harmful chemical materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The amount of excreted fat has been measured in various ways in the clinic to diagnose pancreatic diseases and intestinal disorders, as well as in animal studies. 1,2 One method involves titration of the extracted fatty acid; 3 however, this chemical analysis is complicated and time-consuming, and may require the use of harmful chemical materials. 2 Another approach is a microscopic examination of fat droplets stained by oil-soluble dyes; 4 however, this method does not provide reliable quantification estimates of the fecal fat.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Однако тест ФЭ1 не может исключить легкую или умеренную ВНПЖ, и отсутствует кон сенсус относительно идеальной градации степени ВНПЖ у пациентов с ХП: предложены показатели <15 мкг/г, 50 мкг/г, 100 мкг/г и 200 мкг/г, но наи более часто для разделения нормы и ВНПЖ приме няют порог 200 мкг/г [16]. Метод кислотного стеа токрита -это количественное измерение жира, выраженное в виде процента от всего центрифугиро ванного образца гомогенизированного стула; он хо рошо коррелирует с количественной оценкой фе кального жира за 72 часа [11]. Однако кислотный стеатокрит имеет некоторые недостатки, которые включают отсутствие стандартизации теста и воз можное влияние количества потребления жира во время сбора образцов [11].…”
unclassified
“…Метод кислотного стеа токрита -это количественное измерение жира, выраженное в виде процента от всего центрифугиро ванного образца гомогенизированного стула; он хо рошо коррелирует с количественной оценкой фе кального жира за 72 часа [11]. Однако кислотный стеатокрит имеет некоторые недостатки, которые включают отсутствие стандартизации теста и воз можное влияние количества потребления жира во время сбора образцов [11].…”
unclassified