1973
DOI: 10.1016/0003-682x(73)90019-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The steady-state evaluation of small anechoic chambers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most commonly used test method is the inverse distance draw-away test, or divergence loss test, where the measured pressure should be inversely proportional to the source-receiver separation. 1,2,12,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] Whereas the carousel method gives an indication of the deviations in a plane, the divergence loss test assesses the deviations along a room dimension, or radial path from a source. A comparison of the two methods found differences between the results, but the drawaway test was in accord with low-frequency impedance tube testing of the absorbent material.…”
Section: Measuring the Free Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly used test method is the inverse distance draw-away test, or divergence loss test, where the measured pressure should be inversely proportional to the source-receiver separation. 1,2,12,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] Whereas the carousel method gives an indication of the deviations in a plane, the divergence loss test assesses the deviations along a room dimension, or radial path from a source. A comparison of the two methods found differences between the results, but the drawaway test was in accord with low-frequency impedance tube testing of the absorbent material.…”
Section: Measuring the Free Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anechoic chamber at the LMA has inner dimensions of 5.4 × 6.3 × 11.4m 3 decibelf rance [8]. Thecut-off frequencyofthe chamber of 75 Hz wasdetermined by decibelf rance using impedancetube measurements on the acoustic lining elements butneglecting the iron wire frame.…”
Section: Determination Of the Room Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To characterize the anechoic chamber the properties of the sound source -a coustic center and source strength -must be known. Instead of using an analog compensation method [3,4] or am athematical compensation Received15June 2007, accepted 4November 2007 method [5,6] here an umerical model for the entire bass reflexb ox wasu sed to obtain the acoustic free-field of the sound source. The precise knowledge of the acoustic source enables the determination of the sound field reflected by the acoustic lining.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Useful references concerning the design and qualification of anechoic chambers include [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Utmentioning
confidence: 99%