2007
DOI: 10.1002/fld.1572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The steady Navier–Stokes/energy system with temperature‐dependent viscosity—Part 2: The discrete problem and numerical experiments

Abstract: SUMMARYIn this second part, we analyse the associated discrete problem arising from a conforming finite element method formulation of the mathematical model presented in the first part. Thus, existence and uniqueness of the discrete solution when using small enough data are stated following the same strategy used in the continuous case, with a Cea's type error estimate established as the main result. Some numerical experiments, steady and unsteady, are performed, which allow us to validate the previous mathema… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar scenarios of numerical instability can arise in scalar advection‐diffusion systems 19 . Despite the numerous reports on backflow stabilization for flow problems 4,5,7‐16,20 and 2D heat mass transfer, 21‐25 these strategies have not been adopted for 3D cardiovascular scalar advection‐diffusion systems. Instead, to circumvent the numerical instability issues in the presence of backflow, mass transport models have resorted to unphysical approaches such as the imposition of arbitrary Dirichlet boundary conditions at the outlet faces, 26,27 artificial extensions of the computational domain 28 that seek to regularize the flow profile, or an artificial increase in the diffusivity of the scalar 29,30 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar scenarios of numerical instability can arise in scalar advection‐diffusion systems 19 . Despite the numerous reports on backflow stabilization for flow problems 4,5,7‐16,20 and 2D heat mass transfer, 21‐25 these strategies have not been adopted for 3D cardiovascular scalar advection‐diffusion systems. Instead, to circumvent the numerical instability issues in the presence of backflow, mass transport models have resorted to unphysical approaches such as the imposition of arbitrary Dirichlet boundary conditions at the outlet faces, 26,27 artificial extensions of the computational domain 28 that seek to regularize the flow profile, or an artificial increase in the diffusivity of the scalar 29,30 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the results from do not cover the results in the present note since both contributions have different goals and use different analytical techniques. In addition, we like to mention that a finite element error analysis for a coupled system with temperature‐dependent viscosity is presented in .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We mention here only (Bernardi et al, 1995;Boland & Layton, 2 of 31 R. OYARZÚA, T. QIN, AND D. SCHÖTZAU 1990a,b;Cox et al, 2007;Farhloul & Zine, 2011;Pérez et al, 2008a,b;Tabata & Tagami, 2005) and the references therein. In particular, in (Pérez et al, 2008b) a conforming method is presented and analyzed for approximating non-isothermal incompressible fluid flow problems. However, the analysis there hinges on technical assumptions which may be difficult to verify in practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%