2002
DOI: 10.1099/00207713-52-1-285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The status of the species Lactobacillus casei (Orla-Jensen 1916) Hansen and Lessel 1971 and Lactobacillus paracasei Collins et al. 1989. Request for an opinion.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
49
1
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(35 reference statements)
10
49
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…C in IJSEM Online). These results support the request of Dellaglio et al (2002). Our wine strains will remain named L. paracasei while the Judicial Commission considers the request of Dellaglio et al (2002).…”
Section: S-ardra Fingerprinting Analysissupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…C in IJSEM Online). These results support the request of Dellaglio et al (2002). Our wine strains will remain named L. paracasei while the Judicial Commission considers the request of Dellaglio et al (2002).…”
Section: S-ardra Fingerprinting Analysissupporting
confidence: 75%
“…paracasei and also with L. casei ATCC 334. The grouping of these latter reference strains was observed in RAPD, 16S-ARDRA and ribotyping, supporting the proposal of Dellaglio et al (2002).…”
Section: Ribotyping Analysissupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In an accompanying Request for an Opinion (Dellaglio et al, 2002), we propose that the Judicial Commission consider that the strain ATCC 393 T is scientifically unsuitable as the type strain of the species L. casei. For strains belonging to the same taxon as strain ATCC 334 and NCDO 151, the species name L. casei has to be retained on the basis of its priority over L. paracasei.…”
Section: G E Felis and Othersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, it was proposed to create a new species for these isolates, Lactobacillus paracasei (Collins et al, 1989). It was also proposed that Lactobacillus casei ATCC 334 and Lactobacillus paracasei strains were members of the same taxon and therefore could be united within the name Lactobacillus casei, the name Lactobacillus paracasei being rejected, and designating ATCC 334 as the neotype strain for the species Lactobacillus casei (Dellaglio et al, 2002).…”
Section: The Genus Lactobacillusmentioning
confidence: 99%