“…As already shown in other molecular studies (Ruedi and Mayer, 2001;Hoofer and Van Den Bussche, 2003;Kawai et al, 2003;Stadelmann et al, 2004), and in a paper that explored relationships between external morphology and foraging behaviour (Fenton and Bogdanowicz, 2002), the current morphology-based subdivision of the genus Myotis into four or more subgenera (e.g., Findley, 1972;Koopman, 1994) does not reflect phylogenetic groupings but represent different adaptive convergences. Since only about half of the extant species have been examined genetically, it is still premature to propose an alternative classification.…”