2004
DOI: 10.1054/ijom.2002.0469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The status of the deep surgical margins in tongue and floor of mouth squamous cell carcinoma and risk of local recurrence; an analysis of 68 patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
46
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
46
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The definition of local failure versus a second primary tumor also lacks uniformity. 13,17,19 Some authors incorporate elapsed time into the distinction; for instance, van Es et al and Slootweg et al considered any lesion that occurred after 2 years of followup as a second primary tumor rather than a local recurrence regardless of site in relation to the index lesion. 13,17 Although molecular profiling can potentially increase the accuracy of distinguishing a lesion as a local recurrence or a second primary tumor, currently, it largely remains a research tool.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The definition of local failure versus a second primary tumor also lacks uniformity. 13,17,19 Some authors incorporate elapsed time into the distinction; for instance, van Es et al and Slootweg et al considered any lesion that occurred after 2 years of followup as a second primary tumor rather than a local recurrence regardless of site in relation to the index lesion. 13,17 Although molecular profiling can potentially increase the accuracy of distinguishing a lesion as a local recurrence or a second primary tumor, currently, it largely remains a research tool.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amaral and colleagues studied 188 patients with clinical Stage I/II oral SCC; they found that the disease-free and overall survival rates were unaffected by margin status (5 mm standard) [32]. Weijers reported on 68 patients, all stages, with oral SCC, and found no significant differences in locoregional recurrence between patient groups for negative (2/30 or 6.6%) and close margins (\5 mm, 3/38 or 7.9%), after the exclusion of patients with frankly positive (''cut through'') margins [33]. Similarly, we found no significant differences in locoregional recurrence between patient groups for negative (28/119, or 23.5%) and close margins (\5 mm, 4/30 or 13%), after the exclusion of 19 patients with frankly positive (''cut through'') margins [25].…”
Section: The Prognostic Significance Of Resection Marginsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prognostic significance of surgical margin for LR of head and neck cancer and oral tongue cancer has been reported [1,[14][15][16] and it was confirmed as a risk factor when \5 mm of margin status was encountered even though the patients had postoperative adjuvant therapy. Tumor thickness has been considered to correlate with cervical lymph node metastasis but there is no clear consensus of how to measure depth or thickness and also the decisive cut-off level for elective neck treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…From the statistic evaluation, the thickness of [7 mm is the cut point which significantly affected LR and interestingly, there was no correlation with RR. The postulation is when the tumor depth increases, the possibility of clear deep surgical margin may be affected and there is a study which has reported the status of deep surgical margins as a risk of LR [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation