2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The status and challenges of replicating the mechanical properties of connective tissues using additive manufacturing

Abstract: Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. • Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. • Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 269 publications
(281 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Synthetic materials, such as hydroxyapatite (HA), bioactive glasses, and β-tricalcium phosphate (TCP), are primarily proposed as they are similar to the bone mineral matrix [7], even if they do not have the same biological and mechanical properties compared with bone. In this regard, 3D printing applied to such materials has recently been proposed as an innovative technique for personalized bone substitute therapy, promoting translation to clinical practice [8,9]. On the other hand, animal-derived materials (xenografts) may provide structures similar to living tissues and induce specific cellular responses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synthetic materials, such as hydroxyapatite (HA), bioactive glasses, and β-tricalcium phosphate (TCP), are primarily proposed as they are similar to the bone mineral matrix [7], even if they do not have the same biological and mechanical properties compared with bone. In this regard, 3D printing applied to such materials has recently been proposed as an innovative technique for personalized bone substitute therapy, promoting translation to clinical practice [8,9]. On the other hand, animal-derived materials (xenografts) may provide structures similar to living tissues and induce specific cellular responses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Well-modified mechanical properties are the primary prerequisite for composite metallic scaffolds. The primary obligation of orthopedic scaffolds is to substitute for the non-functioning bone and provide adequate mechanical support; therefore, manufactured scaffolds should possess mechanical characteristics comparable to those of the human bone [ 32 ]. In this study, the compressive strength of the newly developed scaffolds reached over 6 MPa, which was higher than that of human cancellous bone (2–5 MPa) and sufficient for mechanical support [ 33 , 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…pore volume, interconnectivity and distribution) [153,154] (see Fig. 6) [155]. It has become very attractive in the biomedical field due to its cost-effectiveness, possibility to obtain personalized devices in relatively fast times and to process both composites and biomaterials.…”
Section: Additive Manufacturingmentioning
confidence: 99%