1984
DOI: 10.1086/162379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The statistics of gravitational lenses - The distributions of image angular separations and lens redshifts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

16
627
0
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 623 publications
(646 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
16
627
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although late-type galaxies are more abundant than early types, they tend to have lower masses and hence contribute no more than 10%-20% of the lensing optical depth. This is a standard prediction of lens statistics models (Turner et al 1984;Fukugita & Turner 1991;Maoz & Rix 1993) that has been borne out by the data (e.g., Fassnacht & Cohen 1998;Keeton et al 1998;Kochanek et al 2000;Lubin et al 2000). We could attempt to model both the early-and late-type deflector populations in order to compute the total lensing optical depth and compare it with the observed number of lenses produced by earlyand late-type galaxies (as done by Chae et al 2002;Chae 2003).…”
Section: The Deflector Populationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Although late-type galaxies are more abundant than early types, they tend to have lower masses and hence contribute no more than 10%-20% of the lensing optical depth. This is a standard prediction of lens statistics models (Turner et al 1984;Fukugita & Turner 1991;Maoz & Rix 1993) that has been borne out by the data (e.g., Fassnacht & Cohen 1998;Keeton et al 1998;Kochanek et al 2000;Lubin et al 2000). We could attempt to model both the early-and late-type deflector populations in order to compute the total lensing optical depth and compare it with the observed number of lenses produced by earlyand late-type galaxies (as done by Chae et al 2002;Chae 2003).…”
Section: The Deflector Populationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Early studies of lens statistics used lens models with circular symmetry, such as singular isothermal spheres, for which the magnification bias is easy to calculate (e.g., Turner, Ostriker, & Gott 1984). However, symmetric models only produce two-image lenses and cannot be used to interpret the statistics of each morphology separately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the former, one can have lensing by a star (M B 1 in a M _ ) galaxy with deÑection angles of the order of milliarcseconds and by a galaxy (M B 1011 with deÑection angles of M _ ) the order of arcseconds. For the latter, model-dependent luminosity distances must be applied, but this gives us the opportunity to determine cosmological parameters such as the Hubble constant, the deceleration parameter, H 0 , q 0 , and the cosmological constant, " (Turner, Ostriker, & Gott 1984 ;Gott & Park 1989 ;Turner 1990 ;Fukugita, Futamase, & Kasai 1990). A "" giant ÏÏ (cosmological) gravitational lens of the order of 157A has also been detected, but the immense deÑection angle is hardly believed to be the e †ect of lensing (Blanford, Phinney, & Narayan 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%