1996
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-4032-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Statistical Theory of Shape

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
312
0
8

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 367 publications
(320 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
312
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…We would like to note that our usage of the terms shape and pre-shape space differs from that employed in [42,68,119]. In the terminology of [68] a pre-shape space is the space of labelled landmarks modulo translations and scalings and the shape space additionally quotients out rotations as well.…”
Section: Spaces Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We would like to note that our usage of the terms shape and pre-shape space differs from that employed in [42,68,119]. In the terminology of [68] a pre-shape space is the space of labelled landmarks modulo translations and scalings and the shape space additionally quotients out rotations as well.…”
Section: Spaces Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, GM methods are firmly grounded in a statistical theory for how shape is defined and how patterns of shape variation may be analyzed (Kendall, 1984 and1985;Small, 1996). Shape can be defined as a point in a k 脳 p dimensional space (k dimensions, p number of landmarks), the basic assumption of 'Kendall's shape space' (Goodall, 1991).…”
Section: Conformation Scoring and Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, landmark-based shape analysis can reduce the problem at hand to multivariate data analysis where existing statistical tools can be used with minor adjustments. Kendall (1984) is one of the pioneers of landmark analysis, and many others (including Dryden and Mardia (1998) and Small (1996)) have extended these concepts and developed statistical techniques on landmark shape spaces (Bookstein, 1986;Dryden and Mardia, 1992). However, representing an outline by a finite set of landmark points has its limitations, including:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%