2001
DOI: 10.1145/503112.503114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The state of the art in automating usability evaluation of user interfaces

Abstract: Usability evaluation is an increasingly important part of the user interface design process. However, usability evaluation can be expensive in terms of time and human resources, and automation is therefore a promising way to augment existing approaches. This article presents an extensive survey of usability evaluation methods, organized according to a new taxonomy that emphasizes the role of automation. The survey analyzes existing techniques, identifies which aspects of usability evaluation automation are lik… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
334
0
44

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 640 publications
(382 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
4
334
0
44
Order By: Relevance
“…We decided to set up a test where the tester and users were not co-located, i.e., remote testing as defined in [12]. According to Petrie et al [16] classification, the remote testing was carried out asynchronously (i.e., the participant and the evaluator do not participate at the same time) guaranteeing participant independence (i.e., users undertake the evaluation independently).…”
Section: Remote Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We decided to set up a test where the tester and users were not co-located, i.e., remote testing as defined in [12]. According to Petrie et al [16] classification, the remote testing was carried out asynchronously (i.e., the participant and the evaluator do not participate at the same time) guaranteeing participant independence (i.e., users undertake the evaluation independently).…”
Section: Remote Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…an hypermedia node) p : W ebP age = 1 that may be provided as a metadata item inside the HM. If we use a simple automated usability analysis approach [13] to obtain estimations of the usability of Web pages from quantitative indicators, a possible rule contributing to such inference may be the following:…”
Section: Flexible Modes Of Conjunctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, a large number of other automated usability methods exists. Ivory and Hearst (2000) categorized 132 such methods according to a taxonomy and showed that these approaches typically automate only some part of the evaluation process (capture, analysis or critique), and are often specific to a narrow class of systems (such as web pages). Speech-based interfaces are not mentioned in their review, however, in recent years, several publications have appeared concerning user simulation techniques for SDSs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%