2012
DOI: 10.1556/ajur.53.2012.3.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The state of facts of robbing of a grave in early medieval German laws

Abstract: Abstract. In the present paper we analyse the state of facts of robbing of a grave in German folk laws. We pay special regard to the issue to what extent the impacts of Roman law and the Church and primarily German customary law can be demonstrated in the system of state of facts and sanctions of specifi c laws. This investigation requires the analysis of the legal source base as well as some examination in the history of language, which allows a comparative analysis of the issue and helps to highlight the var… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increasing number of studies on the topic grounded in close analysis of material evidence in recent years attests to this new interest (Aspöck, 2011;Chenal & Barrand Emam, 2014;Dobos, 2014;Klevnäs, 2013;Noterman, 2016;van Haperen, 2010;Zintl, 2020), while more source-critical approaches are also being made to the written sources (e.g. Dierkens, 2011;Guillot, 2013;Nótári, 2012).…”
Section: Merovingian Archaeology In the Twentieth Centurymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increasing number of studies on the topic grounded in close analysis of material evidence in recent years attests to this new interest (Aspöck, 2011;Chenal & Barrand Emam, 2014;Dobos, 2014;Klevnäs, 2013;Noterman, 2016;van Haperen, 2010;Zintl, 2020), while more source-critical approaches are also being made to the written sources (e.g. Dierkens, 2011;Guillot, 2013;Nótári, 2012).…”
Section: Merovingian Archaeology In the Twentieth Centurymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overwhelming assumption has been that grave reopening represents a form of illicit robbery or desecration, unconnected to the original burial rite. A number of early medieval law-codes prohibit grave robbery (Nehlsen 1978;Effros 2002: 49-61;Nótári 2012). These have generally been understood to refer to the practices witnessed in row-grave cemeteries, promoting a 'common-sense' explanation that the archaeological evidence for reopening indicates theft or greed (Figure 3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%